Comments on: Who Will Be Joe Lieberman’s Harry Taylor?

By: Healthy Woman

Healthy Woman — Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:07:59 +0000

I like that perspective on it. I have to think about that and get back after I have had a chance to think about it more.

By: Jay O’Neill

Jay O’Neill — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:51:56 +0000

I’m convinced Cheney Bush has something on Lieberman. He either has a girl/boy friend or some nasty financial arrangement that the brownshirt info trollers at the NSC dug up while “looking for terrorists”. I bet Karl Rove has a dossier on everyone in Congress..think of J Edgar Hoover with a super-computer instead of all those little recipe cards.

By: Meow

Meow — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:54:05 +0000

Someone needs to find out what glossy pics BushCo has of Lieberman in a compromising position. He might as well super-glue his lips to Bush’s ass.

By: Pluto101

Pluto101 — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:17:28 +0000

Let me be blunt: I am going to the Windsor Town Hall event tomorrow. I am a constituent, a 17 year old student who has volunteered for Ned Lamont and will do everything in my power to get him elected.

Gimme ammo.

By: Bob Adams

Bob Adams — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 03:21:17 +0000

Dammit! I just got finished with hosting a dinner party and find out I missed this nice juicy Lieberman thread.

Oh well, it’s not like there won’t be plenty more Joe threads in the near future. Regarding Joe’s appearances tomorrow, he ain’t gonna be at any of them long enough to answer more than a couple soft-ball questions planted by his handlers. This won’t be the forum for a Harry Taylor moment. But the chance will come eventually.

By: anon

anon — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:00:21 +0000

Jaysus. Sometimes even the WP can do excellent reporting. That article is the bomb.

By: ccmask

ccmask — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:48:59 +0000

Wilson & Taylor: Thanks for your comments. I wish I went to college like you guys…

Note to self: Take back deep thoughts of getting rid of all the men to bring world peace.

By: Sally

Sally — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:46:44 +0000

And darn if we don’t have Bush’s sanitized groupies in the Senate and House who listened but didn’t really object to his talk of war. As if he would ever willingly talk to anyone who might object to his mad schemes. Let’s pray someone has a plan to sabotage his plan for Iran.

By: Prof

Prof — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:46:42 +0000

Time to move on, and back to the Fitz stand-up routine.

New post by Jane. New thread.

By: grandmatoo

grandmatoo — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:45:16 +0000

I really wish that the military were actually allowed to “veto” their commander-in-chief’s war plans. Unfortunately, that’s not how it works. He gives the orders and they follow them. He hasn’t listened to any military leader who disagrees with him in the past and isn’t likely to start now. The leaders who disagree with him are “retired” early. If one disobeyed him, they would, I believe, be arrested.

That’s what makes the reports of Bush’s plans to attack Iran so scary. The only ones who can stop it are: Us, hopefully with the help of our congresscritters.