<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late Night FDL:  The Fork in the Road &#8211; The Right and Race Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Adams</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61655</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Troll&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61295</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shez, I second you. Call it night of the male.&lt;br /&gt;
Bullgoose, try and understand some female sensibilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shez, I second you. Call it night of the male.<br />
Bullgoose, try and understand some female sensibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61288</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;MarkofIreland, lighten up.&lt;br /&gt;
Mandarin=Official class. All old empires have the official class. That was a joke. I guess I couldnâ€™t possibly expect you to get.&lt;br /&gt;
I wonâ€™t deny I found your post offensively patronizing. You assume I am not aware of the history, and yet because I have a different view point . . . *tsk, tsk* Iâ€™ll say no more on that point.&lt;br /&gt;
Iâ€™ll remind you it was not only the Ottomans that behaved with â€œremarkableâ€ brutality, as you put it. Please donâ€™t make too many facile comparisons to the fractious middle east of yesterday and today and empires in general. You end up flattening a varied landscape. Also beware, of the racism that comes out of centuriesâ€™ old grudges.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarkofIreland, lighten up.<br />
Mandarin=Official class. All old empires have the official class. That was a joke. I guess I couldnâ€™t possibly expect you to get.<br />
I wonâ€™t deny I found your post offensively patronizing. You assume I am not aware of the history, and yet because I have a different view point . . . *tsk, tsk* Iâ€™ll say no more on that point.<br />
Iâ€™ll remind you it was not only the Ottomans that behaved with â€œremarkableâ€ brutality, as you put it. Please donâ€™t make too many facile comparisons to the fractious middle east of yesterday and today and empires in general. You end up flattening a varied landscape. Also beware, of the racism that comes out of centuriesâ€™ old grudges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullGoose</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61218</link>
		<dc:creator>BullGoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part 3&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	Shez, did you accuse anyone at FDL of sexism when certain commenters said men are incomplete or broken because their y chromosome lacks the ‘appendage’ necessary to make it a proper x? Such comments are not meant to be taken seriously, and they should not offend anyone.&lt;br /&gt;
	Be consistent. If you are not offended by the ‘broken x’ comment, you should not be offended by my ‘phantom appendage x’, remark. But if you take offense at sexist-like statements regardless of their intent, then where is your complaint regarding Valley Girl’s #69:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Bullgoose, being on the XX side of the aisle, I always assume, unless I know better, that the really stupid commenters are XY.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	If you simply object to the use of loaded words and phrases like ‘whore’ and ‘penis envy’, then where is your outrage at the four commenters on this thread who used the N-word?&lt;br /&gt;
	And why did you capitalize the word ‘WE’ in your comment? If you had read my remarks as carefully as I have read yours, you would know that I am aware that men can have penis envy. All irony aside, I believe that condition, if it existed, would be peculiar to men, just as breast envy would be peculiar to women. And for the record, I do not believe there is any such a thing as a whore, in the traditional sense of the word.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Part 3</b><br />
	Shez, did you accuse anyone at FDL of sexism when certain commenters said men are incomplete or broken because their y chromosome lacks the ‘appendage’ necessary to make it a proper x? Such comments are not meant to be taken seriously, and they should not offend anyone.<br />
	Be consistent. If you are not offended by the ‘broken x’ comment, you should not be offended by my ‘phantom appendage x’, remark. But if you take offense at sexist-like statements regardless of their intent, then where is your complaint regarding Valley Girl’s #69:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Bullgoose, being on the XX side of the aisle, I always assume, unless I know better, that the really stupid commenters are XY.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>	If you simply object to the use of loaded words and phrases like ‘whore’ and ‘penis envy’, then where is your outrage at the four commenters on this thread who used the N-word?<br />
	And why did you capitalize the word ‘WE’ in your comment? If you had read my remarks as carefully as I have read yours, you would know that I am aware that men can have penis envy. All irony aside, I believe that condition, if it existed, would be peculiar to men, just as breast envy would be peculiar to women. And for the record, I do not believe there is any such a thing as a whore, in the traditional sense of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullGoose</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61216</link>
		<dc:creator>BullGoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part 2&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Websters 2nd college edition defines ‘whore’:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
1)Same as prostitute&lt;br /&gt;
2)Any &lt;b&gt;woman&lt;/b&gt; who engages in &lt;b&gt;promiscuous&lt;/b&gt; sexual intercourse.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Prostitute’, when used as a noun, is defined:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
1)A &lt;b&gt;woman&lt;/b&gt; who engages in &lt;b&gt;promiscuous&lt;/b&gt; sexual intercourse for pay; whore; harlot
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Stud’ is defined:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
3)[slang] A &lt;b&gt;virile&lt;/b&gt;, sexually &lt;b&gt;promiscuous&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;man&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verile:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
1)Characteristic of an adult &lt;b&gt;man; manly&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)Having &lt;b&gt;manly&lt;/b&gt; strength or vigor&lt;br /&gt;
3)Of or capable of copulation; sexually potent–&lt;b&gt;SYN. see MALE&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; did not equate these terms. I merely called the equation out for ridicule. Even those who refuse to recognize the sexism inherent in the way these words are commonly used would see a problem with using ‘blogwhore’ to refer to certain female commenters, and ‘blogstud’ to refer to their male counterparts. Continued…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Part 2</b><br />
Websters 2nd college edition defines ‘whore’:</p>
<blockquote><p>
1)Same as prostitute<br />
2)Any <b>woman</b> who engages in <b>promiscuous</b> sexual intercourse.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>‘Prostitute’, when used as a noun, is defined:</p>
<blockquote><p>
1)A <b>woman</b> who engages in <b>promiscuous</b> sexual intercourse for pay; whore; harlot
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>‘Stud’ is defined:</p>
<blockquote><p>
3)[slang] A <b>virile</b>, sexually <b>promiscuous</b> <b>man</b>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Verile:</p>
<blockquote><p>
1)Characteristic of an adult <b>man; manly</b><br />
2)Having <b>manly</b> strength or vigor<br />
3)Of or capable of copulation; sexually potent–<b>SYN. see MALE</b>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>	<b>I</b> did not equate these terms. I merely called the equation out for ridicule. Even those who refuse to recognize the sexism inherent in the way these words are commonly used would see a problem with using ‘blogwhore’ to refer to certain female commenters, and ‘blogstud’ to refer to their male counterparts. Continued…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullGoose</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61213</link>
		<dc:creator>BullGoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;#111 Shez says:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How offensive can it get to come here with us strong women and have to read bullshit like whore (bad nasty girl) equals stud (good virile man)and then be told WE have penis envy??? Excuse me but that type of disgusting blatant sexism donâ€™t fly. Someone owes us ladies an apology.&lt;br /&gt;
——————————&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;PART 1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I apologise…for failing to use a more obvious irony indicator in my comments. At the time I posted them, I thought a simple :-) would be sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
	My comment #63 references the well-known fact that the word ‘whore’ is used to slander sexually promiscuous women, while the complimentary title ’stud’ is awarded to promiscuous men. My comments were meant to highlight the gender specificity of these terms, and the fact that ‘whore’ is a pejorative but ’stud’ is not, even though the meaning of the words is essentially the same.&lt;br /&gt;
Continued…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>#111 Shez says:</b><br />
How offensive can it get to come here with us strong women and have to read bullshit like whore (bad nasty girl) equals stud (good virile man)and then be told WE have penis envy??? Excuse me but that type of disgusting blatant sexism donâ€™t fly. Someone owes us ladies an apology.<br />
——————————<br />
<b>PART 1</b><br />
I apologise…for failing to use a more obvious irony indicator in my comments. At the time I posted them, I thought a simple :-) would be sufficient.<br />
	My comment #63 references the well-known fact that the word ‘whore’ is used to slander sexually promiscuous women, while the complimentary title ’stud’ is awarded to promiscuous men. My comments were meant to highlight the gender specificity of these terms, and the fact that ‘whore’ is a pejorative but ’stud’ is not, even though the meaning of the words is essentially the same.<br />
Continued…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starazagora</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61111</link>
		<dc:creator>starazagora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61111</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I admire Cynthia McKinney for many of the stands she has so courageously taken. But not this one. I’m proud of her for apologizing and wish she had done that sooner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not a race thing. If she were white I would feel the same way. Wear the ID badge or go through the metal detectors or politely announce yourself. This is kindergarten stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admire Cynthia McKinney for many of the stands she has so courageously taken. But not this one. I’m proud of her for apologizing and wish she had done that sooner.</p>
<p>It is not a race thing. If she were white I would feel the same way. Wear the ID badge or go through the metal detectors or politely announce yourself. This is kindergarten stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen k</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61100</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing Cynthia McKinney to Gordon Liddy is revealing. Liddy is a convicted felon, a dumbass, and an inciter of violence who is embraced by the right and the republican leadership because he brings a constituency into their fold. Mckinney is a smart, well spoken, insightful elected congresswoman who is vilified by the right because they are afraid of her and vilified by “centrist liberals” because they are afraid of the right and/or victims of their own unacknowledged racism.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing Cynthia McKinney to Gordon Liddy is revealing. Liddy is a convicted felon, a dumbass, and an inciter of violence who is embraced by the right and the republican leadership because he brings a constituency into their fold. Mckinney is a smart, well spoken, insightful elected congresswoman who is vilified by the right because they are afraid of her and vilified by “centrist liberals” because they are afraid of the right and/or victims of their own unacknowledged racism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocAmazing</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61040</link>
		<dc:creator>DocAmazing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-61040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding all of this piling-on with Cynthia McKinney:  Does no one remember Bob Barr(R-Unapologetic) slapping an airport security guard?  Check this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2002/09/diddly_04.html&quot;&gt;http://www.motherjones.com/new.....ly_04.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone say “racial double standard”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding all of this piling-on with Cynthia McKinney:  Does no one remember Bob Barr(R-Unapologetic) slapping an airport security guard?  Check this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2002/09/diddly_04.html">http://www.motherjones.com/new&#8230;..ly_04.html</a></p>
<p>Can anyone say “racial double standard”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourdes MenÃ©es</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-60949</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourdes MenÃ©es</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/late-night-fdlthe-fork-in-the-road-the-right-and-race-online/#comment-60949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;DefJef, psychohistorian [an arcane allusion to Foundation?], class, no kidding, just wait till the insecure classes are reduced to desperation by debt service through belated tightening of lending standards for consumer credit and mortgage lending, rising short rates and long rates adjusting for depreciation risk. There will be a whole lotta rage to channel into hatin on darkies and other kinds of liberal atheist scum. By August, just in time for the election, they will be primed to kill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DefJef, psychohistorian [an arcane allusion to Foundation?], class, no kidding, just wait till the insecure classes are reduced to desperation by debt service through belated tightening of lending standards for consumer credit and mortgage lending, rising short rates and long rates adjusting for depreciation risk. There will be a whole lotta rage to channel into hatin on darkies and other kinds of liberal atheist scum. By August, just in time for the election, they will be primed to kill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
