Today’s White House Briefing raises a couple of interesting questions, and I wanted to bring them to everyone’s attention here.
The first was about the change in President Bush’s presser timing yesterday and the rambling answers he gave to audience questions — often completely unresponsive to the actual question itself.
So what’s the point of taking questions, if not to answer them? Could it be to simply appear to be answering questions? Or just to repeat, repeat, repeat?
Yesterday, you almost got the feeling that he was just talking to run down the clock.
But why would he do that? One possible reason yesterday was: To preempt any television coverage of a press conference at which leading Democrats were unveiling their Bush-bashing security agenda.
Indeed, Bush’s event had originally been scheduled for 1:20 p.m. yesterday. But Tuesday afternoon, the White House suddenly moved it up to 12:50. The Democratic press conference was scheduled to start at 1. Bush finally wrapped up his talk at 2:22. Anyone know when the Democrats stopped talking? Anybody see anyone in the audience giving him hand signals?
American politics has a long, long history of political trickery. But oughtn’t reporters pay attention to the maneuvers and actually report on them if they are occurring — instead of just letting them pass by unremarked to the public at large? Isn’t the part and parcel of the whole gig? Or are reporters on the WH beat too afraid of having their cocktail weenie invites revoked if they tell the whole truth about Presidential political maneuvering? It will be interesting to see if there is any answer to this question from anyone at all.
The second is just a nitpicky little thing, really, but it comes up in the transcript of a Tony Snow interview of VP Cheney. Why does Fox News refer to Dick Cheney as "The President Cheney" in their transcript? Just askin’. (And good on Best of Both Worlds for catching it.)
Boy, that Dick Cheney, what a card.
And this is just plain interesting, for everyone who has been watching the poll number trends over the past few months. What this means for the Fall elections is anyone’s guess — but you can bet that Karl Rove will be amping up that "don’t let gays adopt children" rhetoric even more if this continues. Because, you know, Presidential incompetence and inadequacy can always be trumped by a little, old-fashioned "values" manipulation, can’t it?
Man, let’s hope not.
And this…this is just desserts. Never pick a fight with someone who has a photo of you doing the very thing you said you didn’t do. I’m just saying. Amazing how that whole express evidence thing can come back to bit you in the…erm…ass.
Related posts:
- Admiral Mike Mullen: Guantanamo a “Recruiting Symbol” for Al Qaeda, Should Be Closed
- Cheney Refused to Release the Journalists
- Politico on Obama Presser: “Oh, Noes! The Best Reporter on a Subject Got Called on!”
- Liz Cheney Warns Against “Walking Away” from Afghanistan, Apparently Forgetting that Dick Cheney Walked Away from Afghanistan
- They Planted a Gay Whore in His News Conferences!





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search
