Although Nancy Pelosi is not a member of the Senate, she decided to pipe up and discipline Russ Feingold for daring to challenge the hegemony of the GOP:
"I think that things are going well for the Democrats right now," Pelosi told reporters Thursday, alluding to recent data showing that a plurality of poll respondents would prefer a Democratic-controlled House.
So why, she implied, should Democrats risk spoiling the mood?
She rebuffed the call by Sen. Russ Feingold, D- Wisc., to censure Bush for ordering National Security Agency surveillance of al Qaida contacts with persons in the United States without seeking warrants from a court.
"I have no idea why anybody would censure someone before they have an investigation," she said.
This would be the same Nancy Pelosi who, as Pach noted, sits in the same House of Representatives with some of the most corrupt Republicans who have ever climbed out of the primordial slime and attempted to walk erect, yet she actively discourages Democrats who want to file ethics complaints against them.
Ari Berman, writing in the Nation:
Meanwhile, Democratic leaders cry out for investigations–but only in their public statements. "The House Ethics Committee must get to work immediately to investigate ethics and corruption cases in the House, including those involving members with ties to Jack Abramoff," House minority leader Nancy Pelosi declared recently, naming DeLay, Ney, John Doolittle and Richard Pombo as deserving of inquiry. Yet according to Bell, Sloan and lawmakers who asked not to be named, Pelosi has specifically told House members not to file complaints. Pelosi, who said through a spokesperson that she has never been a party to any ethics truce, spent six years on the Ethics Committee during the turbulent Gingrich era ("serving my time," she jokingly calls it). Bell suspects that she’s worried about retaliatory complaints being filed against Democrats. "There are some members who want to act, and when they bring it up with the leadership they’re told to wait a while," says Bell. Congress, he says, "is a self-preservation institution. Members realize that if they rock the boat they endanger their self-preservation. And you can’t file an ethics complaint without rocking the boat."
Pombo and Doolittle are facing tough re-election campaigns this November, and the only reason not to do their jobs and wave big, fat red flags around their flagrant ethics violations is incumbency protection. You don’t challenge us, we don’t challenge you. Their responsibilty to the people who actually elected them is considered not at all.
Pelosi claims there is no truce in place. Which means what, she doesn’t know what Pombo and Dolittle have done? I guess that’s what she has claimed, though one has to wonder what exactly she hopes to achieve in acknowledging ignorance about something about which the rest of the country is only too well aware.
It’s the same frigid recalcitrance that paralyzes the rest of the Democratic establishment — Feingold’s resolution rocks the boat. It makes them all uncomfortale.
Too bad. Pelosi should STFU about Russ Feingold and do her damn job.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Oh, Fitzy!
Remember back when the mainstream worry was whether Pelosi was too radical to be our leader in the House?
Two commenters! More than on the posts that follow this one above. Where is everybody?
I’d be really interested in understanding what the hell is wrong with Dems like Pelosi. Is it so much better to be a minority congressperson than to risk losing your job? Is it just that lack of spine and common sense are pre-requisites for being elected? Does Bush have incriminating evidence on them gathered through illegal wiretaps? Have they just, as Norquist said, been spayed and neutered to be good little compliant opposition party members?
REPUKES are cowardly chicken-hawks: DEMOS are just cowards! Support Feingold & Paul Hackett!! Lwayno. disabled veteran
There is a structural ethical problem that most liberals and many Democrats have. The first instinct is not to get your opponent down, stomp them in the head and kick them until they are blood sausage. But those are the Gingrich-Rove rules.
Feingold’s call for censure is hardly a blood sausage event…but it could turn into one for Bush.
I wish Nancy Pelosi would keep one of the pictures of the Iraqi baby war corpses or a legless US veteran on her desk as a reminder why it is okay to go after these corrupt and incompetent SOB’s.
Slobo’s cell is available now at The Hague.
So FRUSTRATING!!
They’re all sitting in their grand chambers with an armour of creme pies, waiting for the first one to launch.
CHRIST!!
C’MON JACK – START NAMING NAMES!
When matters of national interest are at stake there ought to be a format that lists the e-mails of all respresentatives together to enable multiple send selections. For instance should I choose to send the same correspondence to more than one representative I presently have to go to an individuals page and write an individual communication. Fine for in state business but not too efficient for individuals wishing to communicate with more than one recipient. I did write to Nancy Pelosi about her censure comments, however she apparently has two e-mails. One for constituents and another for out of staters. Thus my mail was returned with instructions to resubmit to the alternative address. There are too many unnecessary layers obstructing efficient communication to our representatives. The process is cumbersome and time consuming. Do these people really care to hear from the people? If I am wrong and there is an alternate group maiing process I’d welcome the info.
And incumbents like Pelosi are the kind of status quo dittoheads that progressives seem to think will represent their interests? Wake up already. These dimbulb republican-liters like Pelosi, Hillary and the rest of the DINOs are out for their own hides. They like things exactly as is. And as long as the GOPers throw a few crumbs from the table every once in awhile, the dimbulbs are happy because as measly and meager as those crumbs are, they’re *still* in better shape with regard to finances, health insurance and job security than 2/3rds of the country. Why should Pelosi rock the boat and possibly endanger her 24k gold plated salary/health insurance and perks?
::::FUCK:::: the dimbulbs. They are republican lite and don’t represent anyone but their own bank accounts. Progressives need their own party.
I’d love to run against Nancy Pelosi again. As a Republican, of course….
The democrats need to fire all of their handlers and pollsters and start speaking from their hearts.