Oh bully for Judy Miller. What a bravura performance last night on Nightline. All that was missing was an atomizer of throat spray and a few strands of tightly clutched pearls.
First she can’t remember who originally told her of "Valerie Flame," then she can’t remember if she gave Maureen Dowd the boot from her White House press room seat but says if Maureen says so it probably happened (we read: witnesses). But she sure as hell remembers telling NYT editor Jill Abramson she wanted to write about Joe Wilson.
With a memory like that no wonder she generally has to make it all up.
On the Jill Abramson front we might actually believe her; if Scooter spoke with her three times on the topic he obviously wanted Judy to write about it and coming from the school of "legs in the air" journalism, Judy usually does what she’s told. It’s everything else that sounds like a pack of self-serving lies. But the curious part comes when Judy says that Libby never told her that Joe Wilson’s wife had any part in sending him on the Niger trip.
She’s said this before but I guess I’ve never seized on it, since it is quite an odd assertion that does little to enhance her already sullied reputation.
According to the indictment Libby was most certainly aware as early as June 11, 2003 that people in both the State Department and the CIA were saying Wilson’s wife was involved in the planning of the trip, and Libby himself had been poking around trying to find out what paperwork would back this up.
In Judy’s own private La Traviata she says:
Mr. Fitzgerald asked whether I ever pursued an article about Mr. Wilson and his wife. I told him I had not, though I considered her connection to the C.I.A. potentially newsworthy. I testified that I recalled recommending to editors that we pursue a story.
So, Ms. Solid Journalist, seeking to "reclaim" your reputation. If Wilson’s wife had no role in his trip to the best of your knowledge, what exactly made this story newsworthy? If you weren’t simply acting as a smear merchant for those who butter your toast, what possible bearing would the fact that Joe Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA have? Judy says:
I said I felt that since The Times had run Mr. Wilson’s original essay, it had an obligation to explore any allegation that undercut his credibility.
What allegation was that exactly? The Jill Abramson thing is starting to make sense. If Judy ran back to the Times dithering about Wilson’s wife’s part in some secret liberal CIA cabal to take down the President well it just isn’t surprising that Abramson paid no attention and hoped Judy’s shrink would eventually get around to adjusting her meds.
Judy goes on to attribute her own personal trials at the Times to sexist fucks who didn’t want women to succeed. Although it would be difficult in this lifetime to make the personal acquaintance of all those who loathed her during her 28 year stint there, my long-term encounters with those amongst them who wanted the head buried no closer than a thousand yards from the body and the mouth stuffed with garlic to assure she never returned attest to their own commitment to women’s rights that renders Judy’s latest pile of excuses a heap of vicious, self-serving spew.
If Judy wants to be taken seriously as a journalist she can stop with the purple dramaturgy, the Edina Monsoon desert ensembles, the awkward schoolgirl tittering at inappropriate moments during her interviews and the outrageous denial for any culpability in anything, ever. Judy’s colleagues hated her because she never met a problem she couldn’t lay off on someone else. Her journalistic "triumphs" now look like a steaming pile of shit since her quote-unquote "access" was gained in the thrall of powerful men she never bothered to question.
Her kiss-up, kick-down journalism make her John Bolton with a pen, and her reputation — such as it is — will probably be best served by keeping future TV appearances to a minimum.
Crooks and Liars has the video of the Nightline TV clip, and ABC News has excerpts not broadcast on television that include her Plame references.
Related posts:



Spotlight






Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake

judy and novakula:cnn’s dream team…
Someday the entire list of people and organizations who/which knew about the impending 9/11 attack will come out.
Will those people be able to face their relatives and neighbors with that on their hands?
While KQED is certainly flawed (especially tv), they may not be able to run AbFab if the broadcast rights aren’t available to public television stations anymore (they certainly run Coupling pretty often though usually very late).
All of the episodes are available on DVD.
Then there was that very odd spin. She was musing on the wrongness of the Intelligence [she had reported] which lead her to think about what other wrong Intelligence there might be which lead her to Syria, Iran, and Korea and what monsterous weapons they might have we don’t know about. She got from overestimates in Iraq to underestimates elsewhere in about a minute. It was something of a window into how paranoid her view of the world really is. She was an easy mark for the apocalyptic stories she was fed before the war.
“legs in the air” journalism?
LMAO!!!
Another story that has been withheld by the NY Times:
Judy Miller and the NY Times knew about the 9-11 threat before it happened, and haven’t published anything to date about that fact.
See this link: http://www.cjr.org/issues/2005/5/judycode.asp
In July of 2001, Steve Engelberg, then an editor at The New York Times, looked up to see Judy Miller standing at his desk. As Engelberg recalls, Miller had just learned from a source about an intercepted communication between two Al Qaeda members who were discussing how disappointed they were that the United States had never attempted to retaliate for the bombing of the USS Cole. Not to worry, one of them said, soon they were going to do something so big that the U.S. would have to retaliate.
pee ess to Mitch: Yes, there is.
Not to mention that I’m PISSED that KQED has dropped AbFab, which doesn’t surprise me since it’s not quite Christian enough for today’s powers that be.
new thread
Mitch | 12.30.05 – 6:09 pm
Speaking from an XX perspective, I have never taken Jane’s comments like the ones you cite as sexism. Jane does have a way with words, and I read these phrases as pithy shorthand for things that Judy has admitted to, and/or well-placed sources have documented. I appreciate it that you are concerned about sexism, and this is an issue that I am attuned to myself. But, I think you are misreading Jane’s intent here. VG
-
John Casper | 12.30.05 – 6:04 pm
Oh, jeez. Drudge ego. I was hoping you had a way of tracking traffic more generally. Nonetheless, you’re a net wiz.
As a counterpoint to that Drudge info, John Lewis HR site has another counter (real time): http://www.house.gov/johnlewis/index.shtml
Currently, the U.S. Debt is estimated at:
Since you first logged on to the Congressmen Lewis’ site, the public debt has increased by:
Interest accumulated since you first logged on:
Your share of today’s public debt is:
The actual numbers don’t show up in cut n paste, but they are shocking.
-
While Drudge gets a lot of traffic (for years, he was either the only person mentioned in stories about online media or one of the few – then came the blogs – plus he did have one of the more useful collections of links for a long time), he doesn’t get as much traffic his stats claim.
His page frequently does an automatic reload.
Jane,
I love and appreciate your blog but there is no place for the sexism of phrases like “legs in the air journalism” and “Judy Kneepads.”
Sincerely,
Mitch
Thanks Valley Girl. Drudge displays them all the time on his site, lower right corner near the archives.
QuickSilver | 12.30.05 – 5:49 pm | Thanks for bringing up a lot of the specifics. I think they add much to the discussion. IMO Judy is still less culpable than her editors and Sulzberger.
Valley Girl: Jane and Redd are my type of women, as in, I identify with them. And don’t even think of calling them “gals”, either.
I wasn’t going to, honest!
QuickSilver — oh what I wouldn’t pay for emptywheel to have a crack at Judy for an hour or two.
Firecrackers, I tell you.
John Casper | 12.30.05 – 5:47 pm
Hey, net wiz, how did you, does one get those numbers?
-
Why don’t journalists question her about specific errors and misrepresentations in her work? Her last article as an embed — the one in which she discovered the “floating Knesset” and the African uranium purchase letter — was so egregious it earned her a recall to the United States and an (apparent) in-house suspension by the Times. Why can’t television journalists ask about the particulars of her reporting? About her mobile bioweapons labs, and every other “discovery” of hers? These were not errors of the intelligence community, these were Miller’s inventions, insertions, and distortions.
And a simple question, which no journalist ever seems to ask her: if she testified honestly in her first grand jury appearance, why was it that she was called back to give further testimony about a previously undisclosed (June 23rd, 2003) meeting with Libby? Why were her lawyers negotiating a deal to have her talk to Fitz only about her July meetings and conversations with Libby, if not to hide the deeper conspiracy? Why was her contempt not lifted until she coughed up her June 2003 notes?
I also caught that funny slip, that it was “more than a year” since taking the notes with Libby that she looked at them again and found Plame/Flame’s name. More than a year would be… sometime in 2004? So what made her look at the notes in 2004? Why did she later write on her website that she discovered them in the Times office, while her lawyer was on the phone(!), only after her 89-day incarceration in the summer of 2005?
Riesz Fischer | 12.30.05 – 5:42 pm
If all the young ladies who attended the Yale promenade dance were laid end to end, no one would be the least surprised. – Dorothy Parker
I trust this isn’t what you mean. Jane and Redd are my type of women, as in, I identify with them. And don’t even think of calling them “gals”, either. ;)
-
Valley Girl | 12.30.05 – 5:38 pm |
Thanks a lot for an excellent post and link.
VISITS TO DRUDGE 12/29/05
008,122,472 IN PAST 24 HOURS
253,522,894 IN PAST 31 DAYS
3,652,337,870 IN PAST YEAR
Jane, I thought that was you and Redd in the picture. I’ve never heard of Absolutely Fabulous, but those two look like my type of ladies!
What a great post!
Somewhere, Dorothy Parker is laughing…
That could refer to half the posts on this thread, but i think you mean Jane’s FPer, and I concur!
And I can only hope that somewhere else Karen Hughes will someday have steam rising from her ears for all eternity as this whole ugly neo-con game is exposed in exquisite slow motion for the fraudulent scheme it has always been.
For years antiwar speeches, writings, and demonstrations have goten people thrown in jail, not to mention clubbed and shot. Judy is perhaps the first pro war agitator to be incarcerated for anything. She may have a place in history after all.
OT From a serious site that watches the news: Editor and Publisher http://www.editorandpublisher……1001772383
Horse Sex Story Tops ‘Seattle Times’ Most Popular List for 2005 — But Here’s Why
Just shows you the power of Drudge…
-
OT but re: NO and Katrina
http://www.editorandpublisher……1001772439
—NEW YORK In a troubling exclusive, the Times-Picayune reported Friday that engineering mistakes that led to the levee failures, leading to the flooding of most of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, “were found and then dismissed in the Army Corps of Engineers’ design review process in 1990.”—
link to Picayune article http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/f…..299960.xml
-
What a great post!
Somewhere, Dorothy Parker is laughing…
from the last thread, I thought the Roanoke Times article was great. We need to pass it around.
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/commentary/wb/46210
Grampa, I’m in western WA, closer to Portland than Seattle.
The AbFab website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/abfab/
Edina’s the one on the right.
Absolutely Fabulous, huh? Thanks. Gee, I was kind of hoping that they were.. oh well… I also see that AbFab is where you go to look at ‘the Edina Monsoon desert ensembles’ too. I’ll try a few of the clips on their internet page.
Regarding new term for Republican tax (or borrow) and spend, there was a mafia term used for awhile on Talking Points Memo. It was when a gang took over a place owned by some one else and gutted its assets, got it into seirous bad debt, stole the income and then abandoned it when it wasn’t useful anymore.
I think that would be the best one to use. It had a kind of gangster flair.
I can’t remember it now. Anyone know what it is?
Not that I believe Miller didn’t first hear about “Wilson’s wife” from Libby – But I heard Novak apologist, and all around evil witch, Kate O’Beirne say the name “Valerie Plame” on television a while ago. It sounded so much like “Flame” it made me wonder if Miller got the name from O’Beirne.
O’Beirne has what appears to be a dental malocclusion, and a way of sucking in her breath when she speaks, that makes “Plame” sound like “Flame.”
The nicest part of Miss Miller’s interview was when she said she wasn’t thinking about what was next for her until 2006. She looked at the camera wistfully. This probably means no one is knocking down the door with job offers.
Ed Lorenz, 69, of Portage, near Kalamazoo, bowled a 300 Wednesday in his first league game of the night at Airway Lanes. When the retiree got up to bowl in the fifth frame of his second game, he clutched his chest and fell over, and efforts to revive him failed.
“If he could have written a way to go out, this would be it,” said Johnny D Masters, who was bowling with Lorenz in the Schoolcraft Miller Lite League.
Thanks, Redd. I have Netflix, so I’ll try to check it out.
So maybe Betty and Veronica weren’t so far off after all?
Novak ‘probably’ regrets Plame leak
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/v…..5140-5536r
The blonde is Joanna Lumley http://www.tmaw.co.uk/joannal.html Like many blondes who have suffered unfairly because of the stereotypical view, she is *not* an airhead.
Grampa — Absolutely Fabulous is a fab British sitcom (or Britcom) that you can still catch in re-runs on BBC America if you get that on your cable. Or you can find it on DVD at Blockbuster. Very funny, in the over-the-top snark department. But I should warn you — my husband isn’t fond of it, so be forewarned its a personality acquisition sort of show. But it makes me HOWL with laughter. Mwahahahaha….
desertwind,
If it hadn’t been for John Wilkes Booth, it would have been a heckuva play.
If Judith Miller wasn’t a pathological liar she could write a heckuva book.
Thanks, OtherWA. Are you in Seattle?
Ted Stevens? The succession just gets better and better.
AbFab was a BBC comedy about two partyin’ fun women who really didn’t understand they’d passed 40 and still acted as though they were 20-somethings. They spend their days drinking, smoking and partying, AND being hysterically funny.
It’s available on dvd, and was run on Comedy Central for awhile, then Oxygen, but doesn’t seem to be running in the US right now.
Ted Stevens, The Great Alaskan Driller, Senate pro tem, I do believe.
–
And the American Hotel is closed, too.
True payback? Wintering in Sag Harbor with a 70+ year old husband, no open restaurants, stores, no job or yardwork to do.
Life sucks, bitch.
SteveNS,
Sorry to spoil Archie for ya, but humor me: what is “Absolutely Fabulous,” and who are those two in the picture at the top of Jane’s post? I’m beginning to suspect that they are both part of the popular culture that I was fortunate to miss.
BTW, would I redeem myself if I told you I listened to my first Foghat album this afternoon? It was kick ass.
Lessee – La Traviata, Chaucer, Streetcar Named Desire and
Judy Miller?
Well, ok. I guess.
Ketchup from several threads.
1. GST – isn’t that short for, “George Said To”?
2. The Tim Abott piece someone had – run that guy for something!
3. Earlier today I caught some short thing on MSNB talking about 2005 as the year of the bloggers (I confess, I didn’t know what one was until the last few months). Some dufus (I use that in its most technical sense) was doing a 60 sec summary and for some reasons wasted his leap second (LUVtoSM) on his profound puzzlement about why no blogs seemed to spring up to “Free Judy” especially when “I mean, the bloggers all say they are all about Free Speech and stuff” (paraphrased and perhaps revealing he’s not too puzzled to try for a low blow and see if it lands?)
4. The official word of “leak investigation” this has been bugging me from the start. Especially since there is absolutely no questions whatsoever that FISA has been violated. Period. NOne. Nada. Of COURSE someone should be able to talk about illegal actions and violations of statutes. :-(
5. Dog Training. I mention it bc it ties in so well with both why we have such a fixation on “tax and spend liberals” and why the talking points Rovian/Mehlman approach words so well, esp when journalists stenograph those points. My first dog that was “mine” was brilliant and after she was about 4 mos, pretty much always did what I wanted as if she had telepathic powers. Scroll forward in life to another dog, a GSD, equally brilliant but not so obliging by nature. So off we go to obedience classes. Top dog trainers gave some seminars where I took her for lesson and the theme was consistent. EXACT REPETITION of EXACT PHRASING. IIRC, there was a good consensus that if you had 21 repetitions sets in a 30 day period, a huge percentage of dogs would have “learned” the message. A pretty acknowledged exception were hounds. Once they had a scent, all bets were off. Seems like there are a lot less newshounds these days. OTOH, looking for a silver lining, the heeling work is pretty impressive.
6. I think that increasing the debt limit should be done. Just like IRL though. IOW, as long as the Administration and members of Congress will agree to be personal guarantors of the increases, then okey dokey. Besides, we need to break in that new Bankruptcy Act. ;)
anon — It’s Patsy and Edina from Absolutely Fabulous. Every time I hear Judy talk about her Pulitzer I think about this episode of Ab Fab.
who is next in line for presidency?
Al Haig
Is it just me or does JudyBot have the same cloying smile-at-wrong-moments
mannerism as Katherine Harris?
–
Question about Abramoff scandal-
If Hastert is convicted and Bush and Cheney are long gone, meaning convicted too, who is next in line for presidency?
The picture is so great, I just had to say something before I actually read the presumably fabulous text!
You’re wonderfully wicked, Jane…..
Awesome, Jane. Brilliant piece on top of which you make me google stuff like ‘the Edina Monsoon desert ensembles.’
Doesn’t get any better than this.
thanks
Happy Abramoffukkah!
Jack is getting ready to sing his magic beans off . . .
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/12/30/182533/56
tuesday could be a very festive day!!!
PRAISE THE HOARD AND PASS THE YAMULAKA!!!!
>Judy’s colleagues hated her because she never met a problem she couldn’t lay off on someone else.< </p>
Every woman in the room knows exactly what Jane is talking about. We’ve all worked with women like Judy Miller. We all pray we don’t have to go through the experience again.
-S
If the President’s C-in-C powers are so plenary that they trump the 4th Amendment, why couldn’t that same Commander-in-Chief simply set aside the 1st Amendment as part of the war on terror?
I am waiting for the lawyer who can make a rational distinction that would convince the Bush Administration to stop at the 4th.
.
Prof | 12.30.05 – 8:11 am | #
Prof,
They don’t intend to stop.
But it will be progressive – “by degrees”, so to speak.
I strongly urge you to look into the precedent for what is happening to your country.
That precedent is England,
The English Constitution (Act of Settlement 1701) was “trumped” by the Treason Felony Act.
That act was meant to be “emergency legislation” too. 1848 was a really dangerous year.
It has subsequently been used to trump just about every law on the statute book.
Including the Human Rights Act, which includes the right to free speech.
These “plenary” C-in-C powers are the bastard offspring of the TFA.
The crunch will come when the C-in-C powers are directed against the judges themselves, as private citizens.
To me, they look like a 21st century Betty and Veronica (for those old enough to remember).
Having watched “Absolutely Fabulous” on occasion, I have to say that you’ve ruined Archie Comics for me now.
Except for this Administration’s miserliness with Appointments for those NOT contributing large sumes of cash, I would expect this idiot to be the next Ambassador to Someplace With Good Shopping and Nice Weather, in return for her service to Shrubby.
April Glaspie with a bigger vocabulary?
anon,
To me, they look like a 21st century Betty and Veronica (for those old enough to remember).
As Chaucer’s ‘A Miller’s Tale’ suggests, playing kiss-up with a female Miller is often frought with peril. In this case, I fear Pinch may have fallen victim to the same fate as young Absalon. One wonders if it has dawned on the dim Pinch that ‘a woman has no beard?’
steve rhodes:
very good point. And Ms. Miller herself has said if something appears in the NYT, it is important to explore any leads that might undercut its credibility.
OT, and frivolous, too:
No credit of the picture. Are those the proprietors? One’s a red head and other is blond. Look like the sort of sphisticated, glamorous, high-intrigue types it would take to run a site like this.
the first words out of her mouth were disgusting
from the first question she sheds blame onto the inteligence community.
she actually says she doesn’t understand how the inteligence community got it wrong
it’s as if she doesn’t even read the newspapers
inteligence was precise and this president knew in no uncertain terms that saddam was no threat
this president doctored the inteligence and time and again the inteligence comminity told the president his assertions were wrong
and then she does it again in the middle of the interview
she’s really disgusting, and she’s still acting in behalf of the whitehouse despite the harm she’s already done.
Jane, I think it would be great to add a compilation of your Judy, Judy articles as an archival treat. I remember that a certain professor of journalism made a comment a while back to the general effect that Judy Miller is probably a sociopath/ pathological liar. I’m on dail-up (still!) so it would take me ages to find that particular comment. That’s what got me thinking about a special archive… I think of her as “Anthrax Judy”. Someone could write a book about this woman… ;)
-
/”is there any dialogue in that scene that Diva Judy could find appropriate?”/
sorry. pilfered all quotes from imdb, none from memory. this unverified, unvouched for script source may (or may not) contain the dialogue you seek.
Brilliant, Reticulant! But you forgot to mention the famous scene where Blanche comes on to the young man collecting subscriptions to the newspaper. Perhaps that’s where Judy decided to become a reporter when she saw Streetcar the movie….is there any dialogue in that scene that Diva Judy could find appropriate?
Bravo!
Since Miller is still allowing herself to give interviews and look awful, someone really needs to challenge her I only fucked up because my sources were wrong.
There were reporters (not to mention a few million people marching in the streets) who looked at the claims with a much more critical eye. Perhaps she should get some training from Knight-Ridder.
And there was this Feb. 24, 2003 Newsweek piece
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1845
And FAIR posted the transcript on 2-27-03 of the interview where Kamel says, “All weapons– biological, chemical, missile, nuclear, were destroyed.”
Seems like Judy or someone from the Times had time to do something on this (which undercut her sources’ credibility) before the war started.
Or even since (I can’t recall this being mentioned in all the reams of stories on WMD).
I used to think you guys were being too hard on Judith Miller, but last night I saw the first bit of the teaser for her TV performance. She made me so nauseaus I had to turn it off.
Her point was that since the “intelligence community” got it wrong about WMD in Iraq, we should be more worried about what’s going on in Iran and N. Korea. As if the fact that the hawks got it wrong in Iraq means we should be more hawkish about other countries that might have WMD. She is a despicable human being.
almost famous.
blanche judy-miller dubois, from a streetcar named desire.
on unnamed sources: Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.
on her reportage: I don’t want realism. I want magic! Yes, yes, magic. I try to give that to people. I do misrepresent things. I don’t tell truths. I tell what ought to be truth.
on propaganda as reportage: I said I was sorry three times!
on developing contacts: Tarantula was the name of it. I stayed at a hotel called the Tarantula Arms. Yes, a big spider. That’s where I brought my victims. Yes, I’ve had many meetings with strangers.
on her treatment of co-workers: Deliberate cruelty is unforgivable, and the one thing of which I have never, ever been guilty of.
on her capacity for truth: I know I fib a good deal. After all, a woman’s charm is 50% illusion.
on her career: What you are talking about is desire – just brutal desire. The name of that rattle-trap streetcar that bangs through the Beltway, up one old narrow street and down another.
on keller: May I speak plainly?… If you’ll forgive me, he’s common… He’s like an animal. He has an animal’s habits. There’s even something subhuman about him. Thousands of years have passed him right by, and there he is. Keller Kowalski, survivor of the Stone Age, bearing the raw meat home from the kill in the jungle. And you – you here waiting for him. Maybe he’ll strike you or maybe grunt and kiss you, that’s if kisses have been discovered yet. His poker night you call it. This party of apes.
to valerie plame: You’re married to a madman.
to mitch mcconnell: Marry me, Mitch.
to fitzgerald: My, but you have an impressive, judicial air.
on the streetcar: It brought me here. Where I’m not wanted and where I’m ashamed to be.
Yes, Jane, you are BRUTAL. But I love it.
If someone had been this frank about shrub before the ‘00 election, the wold would be a very different (and safer) place right now.
What continues to irritate me is that Ms Judith continues to escape any accountability for her part in this senseless war.
I still wish somebody would nail down (bad choice of words?) Miller’s relationship with Bolton.
As always thanks for a great column.
hizzhoner./
the school of “legs in the air” journalism
Absolutely fabulous, Jane!
JK | 12.30.05 – 3:20 pm | #
ummmm . . . although i agree that judy’s school was one in which total submission was practiced . . . i don’t know about ‘legs in the air.’ judy seems to me more of a multi-tasker. more of a ‘take me from behind’ so i can take notes and / or do my nails.
You’re vicious and wicked, Jane. That’s why we love you so much.
Now damn it, why didn’t Nightline hire YOU to interview Miller? Who’s running that joint anyway?
Cozumel, thanks for the Abramoff update. I can’t wait for Tuesday.
the school of “legs in the air” journalism
Absolutely fabulous, Jane!
“I said I felt that since The Times had run Mr. Wilson’s original essay, it had an obligation to explore any allegation that undercut his credibility.”
Why didn’t Miller feel she also had an obligation to explore allegations that her WMD sources weren’t credible? She seemed to think stenography was fine in that circumstance.
“If your mem’ry serves you well,
You’ll remember you’re the one
That called on me to call on them
To get you your favors done.
And after ev’ry plan had failed
And there was nothing more to tell,
You knew that we would meet again,
If your mem’ry served you well.
This wheel’s on fire,
Rolling down the road,
Best notify my next of kin,
This wheel shall explode!”
(”This Wheel’s on Fire” by Bob Dylan and Rick Danko)
Jane,
You’re brutal.
I love it.
Must be a couple of years ago now that I saw Judy Miller and Dana Priest (reporter with the Washington Post) both on Hardball talking about Iraq. The camera cut to Dana Priest as Judy Miller was talking and the look of disgust on her face was incredible. She had to be thinking, what was she doing being in the same room with this Bush flack.
I also had the sense they might have some history.
make that GJ, not GP
Tuesday sure is looking like a good day to not be a Rethug.
Wonder if Fitz has the GP primed for indictments next week?
Sure would be a nice way to start out the New Year. I’ve always preferred a nice house cleaning to start things off on the right foot, so to speak.
Cozumel -
Happy New Year, Mr. Delay.
LMAO
—
Whore of Babylon kinda works…
Jane, you have a stronger stomach than I do. I closed the video clip after about the first minute when she *again* nattered on about how everyone in the intelligence community “got it wrong,” even now when – at least some of us – know all we need to know about the aluminum tubes, the yellowcake, etc. My problem with the interview is not that she continues to lie, but who was that jerk of an interviewer and why didn’t he call her on it??
Oh, stupid question, sorry.
Breaking news…
WASHINGTON – Federal prosecutors and lawyers for Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff consulted briefly Friday with a federal judge in Miami as they put the finishing touches on a plea deal that could be announced as early as Tuesday, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..moff_probe
and coming from the school of “legs in the air” journalism, Judy usually does what she’s told.
cognitive dissonance with the moniker “Judy Kneepads”, but one catches your drift
I said I felt that since The Times had run Mr. Wilson’s original essay, it had an obligation to explore any allegation that undercut his credibility.
Great! I notice how much of an obligation the Times feels to “explore any allegation that undercuts” the credibility of, say, Tierney or Brooks or Safire or Friedman.
Oh, that’s right! If you support Bush, even the most atrocious fabrications need not be supported. But if you oppose Bush, even such rock-solid facts as “the sky is blue” should be investigated and debunked–even if it means making up the most atrocious fabrications.
Miller and the NYT have pushed journalism back about 100 years.
“Although it would be difficult in this lifetime to make the personal acquaintance of all those who loathed her during her 28 year stint there, my long-term encounters with those amongst them who wanted the head buried no closer than a thousand yards from the body and the mouth stuffed with garlic to assure she never returned …”
Sigh. I heart you so much.
I believe Judy’s Professor Emeritus at the School of Legs-in-the-Air Journalism.
“…the awkward schoolgirl tittering at inappropriate moments during her interviews…”
Ain’t THAT the fuckin’ truth? That stupid nervous giggly shit just says to me what a liar she is.
—
Great one!
(from Josh Marshall)
Signatures, Abramoff’s restaurant in D.C. is looking for a new name.
I submitted “Pardon Me” as my suggestion.