
One of the big stories of 2005 has to be the extent to which the media turns out to have been bought and paid for, bullied and manipulated by an elaborate right wing money machine. Each new week brings some shocking revelation about how the White House kept its illegal activities out of the pages of the major papers by its bullshit claims about national security, spiked the stories it found unflattering by denying "access" to journalists and then just plain bought off those who were otherwise too lazy to cooperate.
I have to say the last few weeks have amazed even me.
On one hand it has lead to a burst of blog traffic as people realize they can’t trust media outlets who are so busy dry humping a corrupt administration that reporting the news isn’t even an afterthought. But on the other it has lead to an incursion of GOP money to prop up the right-wing blogosphere in an attempt to skew the dialog in the same way they have the MSM.
People have wondered why we’re bitching about Pajamas Media and the so-called "liberals" who have chosen to hitch their wagons to them so let me explain why this isn’t just some bloggy infighting. When liberal bloggers join the "advertising liberally" network we do one thing — sell ads. Our finances are incredibly transparent, just look up and see our rates and the number of paid ads and you’ll get a pretty good idea of what we make. The rate we charge is based on traffic we manage to generate, subject to the much-vaunted "free market" that the wingnuts are always applauding. If we churn out shit and nobody wants to show up and read it, we don’t make anything.
And most liberal bloggers make just that — nothing. People like TBogg, Roy and Roger Ailes, amongst the very best voices in the blogosphere, all manage other paying gigs and then snatch what time they can away from their families to blog. There is nothing on the right — and I mean nothing — that compares with their quality, their insight, their wit and their panache.
When the wingnuts chant their talking points like a bunch of tambourine-beaters at the airport, they want to be paid for their efforts. And Pajamas Media was set up to do just that. They received by some accounts $7 million dollars to subsidize 70 right wing bloggers, and if you look at their sites there are no ads, many don’t even identify their affiliation with a logo. Look at some full-on loon like the Confederate Yankee who earns his/her 800 hits a day by having seizures over Google’s attempts to mock Christmas with Jesus butt plugs. The General will easily draw twenty times the traffic with his rapier-witted takedown, but the Confederate Yankee probably earns a lot more money than the General. These illiterate zeros are being paid out of principal, not out of any ad revenues. They are all Armstrong Williams.
The Pajamas Media folk ridicule the liberals they have bought for the purpose of rendering them neuter and biting their heads off like chickens in some geek show. Let’s just be clear, they didn’t offer this gig to James Wolcott who could tear them to shreds and blow the pig up from the inside, and they didn’t want anything to do with Crooks and Liars who draw more traffic in a day than all these fools combined simply by putting their cretinous droolings on video clip display. They are not there to make a profit. There is no "business model" involved. And every criticism they all laid at the feet of every East German factory worker after the toppling of the Berlin wall — they have no ability to work in a competitive environment, they know they will never be fired — comes into play. They’re fools, but they’re subsidized fools. They never have to worry about traffic, they never have to be even a little bit clever or creative or think or even spell right.
All they have to do is continue to repeat what they’re told.
In the past year alone many fine voices on the left have stopped blogging because they could no longer spare the time, had to go tend to their lives and finances. You won’t have to worry about that with the Pajamas Media crowd. Even the most dilatory, the most insultingly stupid amongst them will continue to be subsidized and probably make more than Digby. More than Billmon. All that noise about the free market, natural selection and survival of the fittest is just so much racket.
So the next time you hear us bitching about Pajamas Media, the incursion of right wing money into the blogosphere or the compromised voices of the "liberals" they’ve bought, remember that it’s just another attempt to control the message. They’re not our "counterparts on the right," they’re paid operatives. I’ll leave you with this little paean to the free market by Neal Boortz, talking about one of the African-American victims of Hurricane Katrina that earned him one of Media Matters‘ most outrageous statements of the year:
"I dare say she could walk out of that hotel and walk 100 yards in either direction on Fulton Industrial Boulevard here in Atlanta and have a job. What’s that? Well, no, no, no. … Well, you know what? [laughing] Now that you mention it … [i]f that’s the only way she can take care of herself, it sure beats the hell out of sucking off the taxpayers."
If they’d care to explain how the jizz of right wing robber barons trying to preserve their privilege of feeding at the taxpayer trough is oh so much more righteous and anything more than illiterate wingnut welfare then let’s fucking hear it.



117 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Let’s see what the return on investment is, and how long the sugar keeps flowing.
Good point but don’t you think we will laugh at them like we have others no matter what? We laughed at Rush “because no one believes him” and because “he’s a clown” and he now tells 20 million minds what to think and plays a huge roll in sending the misinformation down the right wing food chain to millions more. We laugh at O’reily because “no one in their right mind would believe him” and he has 6 million minds he manipulates with his intentional lies.
The net is different I know, liberals have a voice on the net but what we forget is that these are controlled minds we hope to open – they are NOT going to see what liberals write. They are not going to go to Crooks and Liars or canofun and get a shot of truth. They are conditioned to block out anything negative about their cult even if they are exposed to it. There are about ten main blogs on the left which can push a big story if they all get behind it, but the day to day lies that the right feeds their cult and which forms their basic belief system never see Ma and Pa’s kitchen table in Nebraska. Robert Parry has been trying to get the left to understand we have no media infrastructure for years and no one will listen to him. Remember when Soros said during the campaign in 2004 that he didn’t have to give anymore because the democrats were going to win? haha George S., with all due respect, you have no idea what we are dealing with – 30 million in one election cycle ain’t gonna get it.
What needs to be exposed is the fact that we have a huge national security problem in that MILLIONS are told what to think and how to think it and as we know they are being fed a lot of lies, intentionally.
We have to fight like hell to get them to know one truth, all the right has to do is muddy up the waters enough to keep their cult under control on their big picture. For instance, we all know it will only take about 36 hours, tops, after Rove is indicted before Fitz will be made into a traitor to his country in the minds of this cult which has snatched our democracy.
Sure we may find a few like Mr. Coffey above who will say no to that, but the right will find plenty who will do as they are conditioned to do…that is, protect the cult first.
I dunno if these PJ guys are bought. Wonder how long the subsidies would last if they didn’t stay on message, though.
Seems like they are losing the battle for grassroots support if they need subsidies from unknown sugar daddies.
Let’s see what the return on investment is, and how long the sugar keeps flowing.
A truly wonderful piece of commentary and writing. I’m glad I had the opportunity to read this. Rock on.
Rod
http://www.g21.net/
Pajamas media stands no chance against us, the members of the progressive netroots. I mean it. For a true blog, there must be member-participated conversation. If any of these right-wing smear machines open up their comments section to an active, sharp and angry liberal bloggers (already mad at paid media), we will absolutely eviscerate them.
There is a reason conservative blogging doesn’t take off itself. It’s fucking stupid. The right-wing talking points, spoon fed to a bunch of people too lazy to think for themselves, do not survive enough intelligent scrutiny to get more than 100 members.
I WANT to go on these sites and tell them what’s on my mind. I love a good fight.
calvin is curious. Come on, Jane, tell us what you really think about Pajamas Media. Stop beating around the Bush.
Mark Coffey – my opinions are my own and always will be
That is funny. You really don’t know who made you, do you?
Your opinions are molded like every conservatives – by Moon who has spent billions creating them for you. Conservatives – changing reality for America since 1980 with the help of their savior, Moon.
Why do you think your party is run by these un-American freaks? Who do you think raised them up? You think it was the free market of ideas that created you? hah
Why do you think the Republican “with us or against us” Party is so cult like in its defense of liars and treason? Who do you think has trained you to jump for Clinton’s zipper at any sign of trouble? I bet your site has a nice big batch of “I fear Soros” posts.
While you’re standing up (hahaha) to the right, how many times have you posted this?
“Why are we as conservatives helping Moon subvert the constitution? Why has our conservative movement HAPPILY taken BILLIONS in funding from Moon? Why are we conservatives being such MASSIVE hypocrites by giving Soros crap when he is USA citizen and a spendthrift unlike our NON citizen savior, Moon, who has spent BILLIONS of swindled dollars propping up the most extreme among us the last 25 years? Why is it that we conservatives are such soul selling, witting and unwitting, chumps of Moon’s – bringing extreme right wing and theocratic politics to America? WHY ARE WE CONSERVATIVES WORKING WITH MOON IN HIS EFFORTS TO TEAR DOWN THE WALL BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE which is Moon’s stated goal?
Just because you stand against these extremists on an issue or two doesn’t mean you are not helping them destroy our country nor does it mean you think for yourself. That is nonsense. McCain does that and he continues to enable this bunch of un-american frauds YOU helped take control of our nation. McCain acts more like an abused spouse than a freethinker.
Seriously, we all are subjected to propaganda but, whether you agree with the views or not, at least we get ours from Americans with America’s best interests at heart. Yours come to you from a guy whose stated goal is the “natural subjugation of the American government and population.”
Your opinions? hehe That is funny.
Now, don’t read any of those links and rationalize this all away like you have been conditioned to do.
As Buckley put it when someone asked him if National Review would ever turn a profit: “A profit? You don’t expect the church to make a profit, do you?”
Jane,
One thing isn’t real clear to me. If in fact, traffic at these wingnut blogs is what you say it is (and I dearly hope you’re right), then why bother throwing money at them? Why not just just a send a crisp, new c-note to every one of the hundreds of readers and be done with it? Why bother subsidizing something that doesn’t have an audience?
As always, you rock.
Thanks.
Jane, that post made for terrific reading. I followed the link from TBogg and I’ll add this site to my growing list of blog bookmarks. Thanks…
Mark Coffey: what does it mean to call for Rove’s “signature?”
This was pretty instructive for me:
About two weeks ago, Pajamas Media AND TBogg linked to blog posts of mine in the same week. (Guess that makes me the fucking best moderate in the world!!!! Except I’m, um, not that moderate.) The Pajamas link caused a slight ripple in my traffic. TBogg got me record hits by a factor of 5.
And like you said, who got paid more?
If I were in military intelligence and wanted to try to influence public opinion I think I would secretly fund a bunch of rightwing bloggers. I’d find a rightwing venture capitalist who owned a security company and have him put up the money. then I’d reimburse him with lucrative secret contracts to his company. Maybe I’ve been reading Wayne Madsen too long.
Billmon – you’re the best. I hope you find more time to blog in the new year.
Excellent post, Jane.
Love you and eternally grateful. But, the past participle of lead is led: “has led,” “have led,” etc.
Ridiculous – I’m a member of Pajamas, okay, so let’s get that out of the way. However, no one tells me what to say, or even suggests it, I advertise my affiliation with a link, and I totally do it for selfish reasons, to build traffic.
My opinions are not for sale, and if I feel like criticizing Pajamas, I will (and I have). I lean to the right, but I’m often critical of stands popular such as conservatives, such as the ridiculous notion of teaching intelligent design as science. I’ve called for Rove’s signature, and I’ve questioned the legality of Bush’s NSA eavesdropping program.
Bought and sold? Not at all…my advertising space may be for sale, but my opinions are my own and always will be.
Go check out what TBogg has to say:
http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2005…..flies.html
The last paras are the kickers:
But what really gets me is the swill that you find on the major anchors like LGF, that Wolcott describes above, and how PJM advertisers like Victoria’s Secret and Circuit City feel about having their ads placed on StormFront Lite and its lessers…unless of course Victoria’s Secret is getting ready to launch their Illsa, SheWolf line and Circuit City is having a sale on nipple clamps and car batteries, in which case it all makes sense.
Maybe someone should ask them.
Yeah, maybe someone should.
Maybe someone should collect a list of PM advertisers and send them snippets of, say, a typical rant from LGF’s “Iron Fist”, with a note explaining that their ad dollars keep this guy in Cheetos.
Oh gosh – is that Billmon up there? I should tell you that I’ve been a fan for ages, from way back when the bar was always open. I think you’re among the best writers I’ve ever read – and I don’t just mean online or bloggers.
Your post, The Bloody Shirt, and the comments that it inspired left me bawling like a baby.
“My blogging may not be very good”? pfffft!
They don’t have a business model? Sure they do. It’s a modification of the one found in “The Producers”.
1) Put together a lot of investment capital, never intending to repay it.
2) Find the worst writing in the world to spring on the public.
3) Here’s where it differs from “The Producers”… when it flops, just get more investment capital.
The point is not to be a business… it’s a loss leader for BushCo. It’s another source of quotes for Rush and O’Reilly, like the think tanks, only dumbed down.
Whoa! You’re on fire! I’m going to have to shut my computer down and apply ice packs to the monitor.
Fucking awesome post!
Wonderful, just the right tone.
Great job, Jane!
It’s so true – and just as true in the traditional right wing media.
Bill Steigerwald, an associate editor of the Richard Mellon Scaife-owned Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, admitted to me over the phone two years ago that in the 11 years of it’s existence the Trib has NOT ONCE TURNED A PROFIT. NOT ONCE!
Now, Steigerwald can, ofcourse, deny that he ever said that. But there are other sources that confirm the Trib’s abject market failure.
A former Trib reporter, Dave Copeland, wrote an intriguing insider cover story on the Trib for a local alternative newsweekly.
Here’s some of what Copeland had to say:
Critics like to call the Pittsburgh edition of the Trib “a rich manÂ’s plaything,” and perhaps it hurt so much to hear it when I was working there because it was true. Compared to the Greensburg edition of the paper — and most other newspapers, for that matter — the Pittsburgh Trib never struck me as a legitimate, for-profit operation. In 2000, IÂ’d heard a rumor that the Pittsburgh edition had recorded a $200,000 profit the year before. That would have been the first profit it had earned since it was formed in 1992. Then again, I suspect a bigger deal would have been made of the profit if it had been true. When the Pittsburgh editionÂ’s Sunday circulation cracked 100,000 for the first time, after all, the feat was recorded with a banner that hung in the lobby for months.
Such concerns made me uncertain about the future I had at the paper. Scaife is 72 and — if heÂ’s not the immortal devil liberals claim — has no heir apparent to continue financing the paperÂ’s Pittsburgh edition.
As a closely held, private company, the Trib didnÂ’t share reliable circulation figures and financial results with low-level editorial people like me. But there have been hints that the Trib is struggling, from a freeze on cost-of-living raises, to the almost complete elimination of overtime, to layoffs that went down shortly after I departed. Two years ago, I was in a bar with a human-resources manager who made a cryptic joke about the companyÂ’s financial health.
“Are you saying I should dust off my résumé?” I joked back.
He suddenly got serious, leaned in and looked me in the eye. “You know the Pittsburgh Trib doesn’t make any money, don’t you?”
And, incidently, if you click on “Bill Steigerwald” above, the link takes you to his most recent column entitled “Greatest Hits of 2005.” And, in traditional right-wing fashion, it’s nothing but a collection of quotes from rightests from Jeanne Kirkpatrick to Tony Snow, and is devoid of context or any point.
So, there you have it. Just like with so much else from the right – from paying “witnesses” to lie about the Clintons, to using Soviet ball-bearing factory economics to keep their swill in circulation – their own actions defy everything they claim as gospel.
Nobody in America ever went broke by appealing to the prejudices of old rich white men.
I first heard this statement back in the late 1980s, in reference to right-wing think tanks. In fact, I think it was more specifically in reference to the rise to prominence of Dinesh D’Souza. I wish I could remember who said it.
But it got me thinking that the financing of right-wing bloggers is nothing new. It’s just one more step in the financing of sinecures for right-wing propagandists that has been going on since the 1980s, 1970s, and earlier.
One of the things that struck me as far back as the Reagan administration was how whenever the MacNeill-Lehrer report had some experts appear on a panel to debate some issue of the day, an amazing number of “experts” were nothing more than propagandists from the Manhattan Institute, the Hoover Institution, what have you. Anything with “institute” or “institution” in its title was reliably a home for development of right-wing talking points.
But the sheer number of these right-wing “experts” back in the 1980s was astounding. MacNeill-Lehrer had at least 2 or 3 right-wingers on for every moderate, or for every real expert. And probably had at least 5 or 6 right-wingers on for every voice that even slightly left of center.
A few times I wrote to MacNeill-Lehrer in those days, complaining that they should at least accurately identify the Manhattan Institute and the Hoover Institution as right-wing think tanks, instead of leaving the false impression that these places were really devoted to true research.
Well, the right has moved far beyond merely providing talking heads for the talk shows. The think tanks, talk radio, syndicated columnists, Fox news, bloggers, Armstrong Williams and his clones — it’s all the finest propaganda that money can buy, distributed through every medium. Through even the very newest media, such as blogging.
My blogging may not be very good…
Gimme a break, billmon; your kung fu is the best, and no one who knows what you’re capable of resents the glacial pacing you’ve adopted to stay sane.
jeez Jane…
Firedoglake AND Talk Left and Max Sawicky are all on the PJM blogroll….
(interestingly enough, Tom Maguire’s Just One Minute isn’t on the list!)
Jane,
You know Hollywood – has Roger L Simon always been so weird? Dang, I really loved his mysteries. What the heck happened to him? i thought he was one of us?
http://www.consortiumnews.com/index.html
this has to be the best new blog in the last three years.
jesus christ on a cracker i couldn’t have said it any better
excellent post’.
as they say in yiddish ”gut gesocht”
“Even the most dilatory, the most insultingly stupid amongst them will continue to be subsidized and probably make more than Digby. More than Billmon.”
Just for the record: They would definitely have to be paid more than me because I’m not being paid anything — I’ve never taken ads (from blogads, advertise liberally or anyone else) and after a few painful experiments with cyberbegging, I’ve stopped doing that, too.
My blogging may not be very good, and it may not be very frequent (especially these days) but it IS free — in both senses of the word.
In my experience with Silicon Valley venture capitalists, they are looking to make money. So, either Roger Simon has some kind of track record or contacts that allowed him to persuade these folks to pitch in this money.
These VCs are sharks. And it seems they want in on the money making opportunities. But it does not mean they no anything about the blog business. Threw money down a rathole on many. many dot.coms but they also hit it big with Yahoo, Google, eBay.
Stop The Stealth Subsidy of FOX NEWS
“The Solution is simple: Tell your cable or satellite provider you think Fox News is too extremist and biased for mainstream consumption.
Insist that it be treated like other controversial cable channels – like HBO, or a porn channel – where customers must specifically request it, and pay a separate subscription fee. Tell them you think right-wingers should fund the full cost of their daily propaganda fix.”
http://www.starvethefox.com/
http://www.starvethefox.com/03TheSolution.html
http://currentera.com/KnowThineEnemyMore.htm
But congress is run by elected officials that must go along with public opinion, right? Whoever controls the media controls public opinion. Public opinion is in this case being a group of voters large enough to win elections. So no one will have to believe me, this site has quotes straight from the mouth of the media and many others. All, yes, all major media groups are owned by major corporations.
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the United States, now there are only 5. Everything that is presented to us by these media groups are going thru the corporate filter. This is a huge problem. Our government is a system of checks and balances. What that means to us is that if one section does not exercise its power to regulate, then by default, the other part can do pretty much whatever it deems necessary. That is exactly why it is so important to vote, and more importantly to vote informed.
With the advancement of the internet, we have the opportunity to be informed voters with relatively little effort, but we must be discerning. There are corporate sponsored media sites, but there are also publicly funded non-partisan sites…
=The book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions by John Perkins grants us incite into the world of corporatocracy from the point of view of the deal maker himself….
http://www.witnesstorture.org/
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/repor…..ontent=684
Center for Constitutional Rights Statement on Dangers of Court-Stripping and Graham-Levin Amendment
Synopsis
As Congress supposedly outlaws torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by its support of the McCain Amendment, it will at the same time foster both torture and indefinite detention without judicial oversight if it supports the Graham-Levin Amendment. What McCain gives with one hand, Graham-Levin, as now proposed takes away with the other.
McCain forbids torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading interrogation. Graham-Levin, on the other hand, authorizes the use of evidence obtained through these methods in military tribunals, “if probative,” ie, if it is useful or relevant to the proceedings. Since virtually all information is “probative,” this provision opens the door wide to the torture that McCain supposedly shuts. In addition, while we have one public document, the Army Field Manual, that forbids torture, the Administration has just introduced a secret “Addendum” to the manual that essentially sanctions torture.
Further, Graham-Levin prevents any victim of torture at Guantánamo from filing a lawsuit against those responsible. The message that Graham-Levin therefore sends is that regardless of what Congress says in McCain, there will be no public airing of torture when and if it happens, no sanctions for engaging in torture, and no compensation for victims of torture. For centuries, torture has been the most reviled thing that one person can do to another. This law will deny to victims of those acts the right they have held for centuries, to go to court and sue.
Most disturbing, Graham-Levin will eliminate the historic right of habeas corpus for anyone held at Guantánamo. Federal courts will be stripped of habeas jurisdiction for the first time in well over a century. By undertaking a major change in the jurisdiction of federal courts, by way of eliminating a right, the origins of which go back to the Magna Carta in 1215, Graham-Levin constitutes a beachhead in what we fear to be a campaign to undermine fundamental rights in the United States and around the world.
The New York Times called the Graham-Levin amendment “a malignant measure” in a critical editorial today, and warned that it “would do grievous harm to the rule that the government cannot just lock you up without showing cause to a court. This fundamental principle of democratic justice must not be watered down so the Bush administration does not have to answer for the illegal detentions of hundreds of men at Guantánamo Bay and other prison camps.” The Center for Constitutional Rights stands with all the leading civil and human rights organizations to condemn the Graham-Levin amendment…
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/home.asp
United States in compliance with the statute. Warrantless wiretapping against citizens
Read more. . .
This is the same way they have conned the nation into thinking they have real support. They bitch about Soros spending a few million in one election cycle yet you have the right’s savior, Sun Myung Moon, outspending Scaife to save them. Moon spent billions bringing HIS brand of hard right theocratic politics into control of our government and the right worked with their TRUE savior to do it.
Yes, Moon spent BILLIONS bringing the “newt” right to power. Moon even says his job as savior was to do so. No it wasn’t the “Newt” revolution in 1994, it was the Moon revolution, he paid for it, guided it.
Here’s a quote from “Moonstruck: The Reverend and his Newspaper” by Ann Louise Bardach, an article that was originally to have appeared in Vanity Fair in 1992 but was killed. The article finally saw print in 2004 when included in the book Killed, Great Journalism Too Hot to Print by David Wallis.
quoting Bardach from 1992:
Bristling with emotion while thumping the podium, he[Sun Myung Moon] told a stunned audience that he had already poured a staggering $830 million into the Times. Moreover, he said that he personally raises the $7 million dollars each month needed to keep the paper afloat.
If Moon’s figures are correct, they are a record-shattering sum for the newspaper business, surprising previous estimates of $35 million to $50 million annual losses for the paper. Time Life pulled the plug on the Washington Star when its losses hit $30 million while the Dallas Herald owners closed their doors after less than $20 million seeped into the red.
Notably among the paper’s(Washington Times) first staffers were the children of conservative luminaries, a group dubbed the “mini-neocons.” They included John Podhoretz, whose parents Norman Podhoretz and Midge Dexter are veritable conservative institutions, Liz Kristol, Irving’s daughter, Danny Wattenberg, son of Times columnist Ben, and Dawn Weyrich, daughter of conservative icon, Paul Weyrich. …
Charlotte Hayes, who wrote a hilarious and snarky memoir in The New Republic entitled “I was Moonie Gossip Columnist,” still laments the loss of the generous expense account she had at the paper. “This is on the Rev.,” Hayes, a thoroughbred conservative, would tell sources as she lunged for meal checks. “The [Washington] Times,” she added drolly, “is a place for free market conservatives to escape the free market.” ……
Some insiders say that the Unification Church was the number one contributor to conservative causes throughout the 1980s.
_________
CLICK HERE for more about the conservative’s savior and how he molded them and brought them to power. No it wasn’t the product of the free market of ideas nor any democratic process. It was paid for and guided by their “True” savior.
John Casper,
Thanks for the background on Arendt. I know nothing on the personal side, and it’s been decades sense I read “The Origins . . .” Just remember reading that and another book on the rise of Hitler, whose author I can’t remember — the scary realization was that it could happen anywhere.
obsessed 12.26.05 – 6:42 pm
Thanks much for the perspective and the info. I’ve bookmarked both the links you gave, and will check them out, along with the other great ideas people have posted, in a mammoth music indulgence. The drums thing sounds really interesting and appealing! As for dancing, I love to dance, but I don’t have a “procrastination barrier” to overcome there, as I do with the writing stuff. But, dancing music is good for overcoming resistance to housekeeping chores– so I’m putting that dancing music on my list too!
-
May I also say Pajamas is the most dumbass name for anything ever besides actual sleepwear. I’m always especially annoyed by this kind of preciousness, let alone from America-destroying whores.
new thread: “The Horror”
Not news to those in the know, but a good summary article from E&P http://www.editorandpublisher……1001737349 Bush Pressed Papers to Kill Scoops on Domestic Spying, Secret Prisons
-
Jane: What a fantastic post. Thank you in immeasurable amounts.
Whenwego: Lousy idea. Funding bloggers defeats the purposes. Fighting fire with fire is, in this case at least, doomed to burn out good flames like this one here.
And one random note re Heidegger: he also had initially dedicated Being & Time to his teacher (Husserl) but struck the dedication for the second edition due to Husserl’s Judaism.
Anyway, thanks again Jane. This was post was a grand slam.
Here is what the Bush administration lists as its successes for the year coming to a close:
A new banckruptcy legislation which makes it much more difficult for Americans to clear up their debts. (an obvious win for the banks and the upper class economically elite)
A tightening of restrictions on class action lawsuits. (another hugh win for the wealthy and Republican)
Confirmation of John Roberts as chief justice of the Supreme Court. (another big win for the conservative right-wingnutz)
Another free trade pact. (serves only to move american jobs out of the United States. Promotes sweatshops. Another greedy win for the Republican party)
Major energy legislation. (does absolutely nothing to lower the price of a gallon of gasoline. A big win for the oil companies, obviously)
The Bush (acknowleged) list of regrets and disappointments in the past year:
Failure to get Harriet Miers on the Supreme Court.
Failure to plunder the Alaska wildlife refuge.
Being forced to accept John McCain’s demand for humane treatment of foreign detainees.
Inability to extend the Patriot Act indefinitely.
Inability to discredit and stop the European Union’s vow to probe allegations the U.S. has been holding suspected freedom fighters from Iraq in secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe.
Unbelievable! How are we to stand another three years of these kinds of successes, regrets and disappointments?
Nobody in America ever went broke by appealing to the prejudices of old rich white men.
I can’t believe you guys are talking about Latin music and that it’s not my fault!
Oh, and count me amongst the bloggers who finally gave up. Between real-life problems pulling at me (mostly working 11.5 hours a day, six days a week, plus exhaustion which has exacerbated my depression), I just couldn’t keep up with it anymore. Besides, I might as well have spoken to a digital void.
Valley Girl: Ah, now I’ve read the original post – you’re looking for music to facilitate the creative writing mindset. Cuban “timba” music would NOT be for this!!! It’s an ultra-funky combination of salsa, African folkloric music, and American R&B like Earth Wind & Fire & James Brown. It’s almost impossible not to dance to and even if you’re just listening it’s all-consuming to follow all the interwoven percussion parts. Here’s an introductory article with audio examples to give you the basic idea.
http://www.timba.com/artists/c…..=CH_TD.htm
These bands used to come through the US almost monthy and gave the most overwhelming live concerts imaginable, until a certain president took office and stopped allowing entry visas for various corrupt, incompetent and otherwise unforgivable reasons.
But … getting back to your question, there is a type of Cuban music that would be ideal for creating the type of trance you’re looking for. It’s called “batá music” — it comes in two forms – vocal, and just drums (seco). I would recommend the latter, because the singing would be distracting. The piece of music you want to get is called the “Oru Seco”. It’s just 3 drums and extremely hypnotic. Here’s a good recording:
http://batadrums.bigstep.com/i…..ID=1118535
GWB, El Capitán of the American Talibán has also banned this type of music, by the way. In fact, if you buy it on line, the NSA will probably put you on their terrorist list!
Valley Girl:
I don’t think that they have the intellectual firepower to be anything but smug revolutionaries in the jammies…
Of course, Roger el Simon’s PJs consist of stained wife-beater t-shirt and crusty boxers. They just couldn’t come up with a graphical artist that would use him as a model for their logo.
Yikes. Sorry for not answering earlier about the Latin music.
I listen to Latin pop/Tejano music. And I simply ADORE mariachis. If I’m at a restaurant here in San Antonio, I want my mariachis! You can get mariachis at hamburger joints (Chris Madrid’s). We even have 24 hour live mariachis. Just go to Mi Tierra for pannes dulces at 2 a.m., and you can have your serenade. And of course there’s the forever popular icon of the Mariachi Mass at San Jose Mission. Ah, the joys of living in this city.
Anyway, I love Flaco Jimenez, Los Super Seven, Lydia Mendoza, Los Tigres del Norte, Paulina Rubio, Thalia, David Lee Garza, and, of course, Selena. And that’s a brief list. I know I’m forgetting some great artists here, but I’m kinda out of it now.
Not much of that is instrumental, though.
OT, but I just saw “Good Night, and Good Luck” with David Straithern as Edward R. Murrow and George Clooney as Fred Friendly. Any FDLer would be inspired and thrilled to revisit how Murrow stood up to that thug Joseph McCarthy. Straithern is brilliant. A must-see movie.
Hanna Arendt, thanks for mentioning her scarecrow. I probably don’t have all this correct, but here is what I think has come out about Hannah in the last few years. She had an affair with one of her teachers, Martin (Being and Time) Heidegger. After the passage of the Nuremburg laws, 1933, Arendt was more fortunate than many of her relatives and was able to get out of Europe. Heiddegger joined the Nazi party and fired many of the semitic Professors, (Karl Jaspers, I think) who had been his collegues and replaced them with “arryans.” After WWII, scholars avoided Heidegger like the plague and his financial situation was perilous. Hannah Arendt came to his assistance and helped him get some things published so he and his wife would not starve. http://www.newcriterion.com/ar…..6/lang.htm
Gads, I forgot to close the tag. Please pardon me, but I was subjected to near lethal doses of small children for three days…
Would not closing your tags be considered the Internet equivalent of walking around with your fly unzipped?
obsessed 12.26.05 – 6:25 pm
If I understand your question correctly, here’s my answer: “Pajamas Media” is not Jane’s phrase- that is the actual “id” for a company name that Simon et al. chose for their venture.
-
Edward Teller
This source indicates that tne NSA’s budget exceeds the Defence Intelligence Agency. Of course, the DOD has more total dollars to move around.
Dave Aitel of immunitysec.com when asked of his first job there replies that the first thing you learn at the NSA is not to talk about the NSA.
Those interested in network security from an offensive perspective will find his company and their services more than a little interesting.
Wow. You didn’t just hit it out of the park, I think it might be somewhere out towards the far boundaries of the next county.
yam | 12.26.05 – 6:17 pm
Just saw your answer about “Pajamas Media”. Do you suppose the name was meant to be a snark at the “left wing” bloggers yet incredibly “in the know” nudge, nudge, wink, wink, at the same time? IMO, a silly choice, whatever they were trying to convey!
-
I think that people who support right wing blogs are a relative rarity and consist of people for whom there is no real hope anyway. They’re militantly ignorant and only seek confirmation of their own prejudices and non reality-based views.
Although W and company enjoy the support of the foregoing group, they really rely for their survival on the ignorance of the many. This group consists of people who are either: (1) not curious and/or interested; or (2) too overwhelmed trying to manage their everyday lives to be able to pay attention to what’s going on. These groups are not suddenly going to start reading right wing blogs, or any kind of blog, no matter how well-funded.
Most people who seek out alternative news or information do so because they’re curious and engaged. Consequently they’re not satisfied that the MSM reflects objective reality. For these people the nonsense spouted by Malkin and others is tranparently ridiculous. It certainly won’t become any less ridiculous when the propaganda is better funded.
I get that bloggers can and do blog in their PJ’s, and while playing with their toddlers and poodles, but what’s the derogatory connotation that differentiates a “Pajama Media Blogger” from the ones like Jane, RH, EW, Jeralyn, Kleinman, Marshall etc. who at least for me have almost completely replaced the MSM as credible source of news, analysis and opinion?
dead last >”…The best way to stop these thugs is to use economics….If every email with certain words gets pulled, then we should make sure all emails sent contain “offending” or “suspicious” phrases…”
Indeed; a very old & honored net tradition which goes back beyond general public access (days of “bang addressing” anyone ?)
http://iasl.uni-muenchen.de/li…..isturbance
“Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable” – attributed to John F. Kennedy
“Or Air America Radio. NOTHING RIGHT WING, EVER”
Hey Karen (and anybody else),
The Air America in my area has Jerry Springer in the morning (ugg). Some larger Air America markets carry Stephanie Miller in the morning. She’s a riot and used to have a cable a show called “Equal Time” years ago. I get the audio feed on my computer from this site…
http://www.wavz.com/main.html
I also have the same question as do puzzled and John Casper- Where did this term “Pajamas Media” come from? Or, in my own words, where did this incredibly stupid name come from? Are they all in bed with each other, or what? That’s the only explanation I can think of, so far…
-
Hmm. Very, very interesting.
Take a gander at OpenSecrets.org, type in the names Chernick, Aubrey and Koshland, James, look at donations for the last two election cycles.
Apparently when it comes to money the rules change for some people — or there’s something else going on.
First, thank you Jane for explaining the anger directed at Corn’s arrangement. As one of those who arrived late and did not understand this reaction before, I can now see the justification. Your statement is as much a lament as a rant, but either way its very thought provoking.
I’m sure no one here is surprised that money buys influence through whatever means are available. Paying bloggers to sell the “right” message is just the latest example of something we see in every media. How could we expect blogging to be different?
If money buys influence, then lots of money buys more, and too much money may buy too much influence. Perhaps that outcome is the one we fear most, because too much of the nation’s wealth seems already in service, through media ownership, to too narrow a range of views.
It seems unrealistic to expect we can stop wealth from defending itself. We cannot (and probably should not) outlaw political advertising. But we can use the 1st Amendment to its fullest, to get out a different view based on the truth as we see it, and that is a large part of what firedoglake is about. All who participate here serve that cause.
Further, I see no reason why progressive wealth cannot also support aspiring bloggers with progressive views.
Beyond that, we can use government to help redirect wealth to help fund the ability to sustain alternative views — think of CPB/PBS — but even here we see that the other side does not share this vision and is perfectly willing to corrupt it to serve radical partisan ends.
So the problem is not just the funding of rightwing blogs. It’s the disproportionate funding by those with the greatest wealth going to the protection of that wealth and the systems that create it.
There may also be something deeper in Jane’s lament. Look at the issues that Jane and Redd (and their underfunded colleagues on other “liberal” blogs) have been raising. A recurring theme is a rising fear of a regime that seems to be operating without constraints — no limits on claims of authority, tight party control over the budgets, constant claims on patriotism in support of an endless concept of “war,” an almost total disregard of truth and few if any ethical constraints regarding the means that may be employed in the service of questionable ends that are repeatedly redefined and misrepresented.
It is a disturbing concentration of power, and the fear is that it will become self perpetuating. What is being described is something that Hanna Arendt would recognize: the beginnings and trappings of a totalitarian state.
We are not there, yet, by most measures, but we are on a slippery slope, wondering when the majority of Americans will recognize the danger and start grasping for firmer democratic principles to hold on to. IMO, our job is to reverse the slide and point out the handholds.
obsessed:
What is the meaning and origin of the term “pajamas media”?
The term is from, I believe, that these guardians of that is right and true protect the blogosphere against the assaults of the MSM. That they are part-time patriots that blog in their PJs is the cause of their logo.
Sunshine patriotism at its best.
From the Yahoo article at: http://tinyurl.com/dqcxa
“Pajamas Media will feature content from over 70 noteworthy bloggers. The company was founded in 2004 by acclaimed novelist and screenwriter Roger L. Simon and Charles Johnson, software designer, musician, and author of Little Green Footballs.”
I got yer Johnson right here….
John Casper:
You have become an internet/ links wizard!
-
obsessed | Homepage | 12.26.05 – 5:55 pm
obsessed- this was a question of mine posted OT on an earlier thread, when things were very quiet. I was looking for suggestions for good “writing music” for technical stuff, not creative stuff. Best being instrumental, kinda hypnotic, energizing, and as ReddHedd added “centering”. Someone mentioned “Latin music” but without a specific suggestion. That’s what JC is referring to. Original post at: http://www.haloscan.com/commen…..37/#202241
-
Just got back from Christmas.
Way too much family, -and never enough.
OK, I’ll read the threads now.
Yet another great liberal blog I can add to my growing list. I stumbled upon this from Daily Kos, I think?
Fantastic, kick-ass and dead on the money rant, Jane. They can’t even understand your last sentence, much less answer to it, hon.
And as a by the way, I have a rule about right wing bloggers, pundits and talking heads on TV and on radio: I do not listen to or read them, period. I won’t click on a link that goes to a right-wing site. I get my news from internet sources I’ve determined to be as accurate as possible nowdays. I don’t watch TV “news” at all and I listen to music in the car. Or Air America Radio. NOTHING RIGHT WING, EVER. They’ve all gone completely nuts, right over the edge into the abyss of lunacy and as a general rule, I don’t sit around reading or listening to fruit baskets.
That’s their greatest fear: being ignored. The sound of crickets chirping. A dead microphone.
Eagleye – was hoping the $ came from Abramoff et al. Would have enjoyed that romp.
LJ/Aquaria- Latin music- is there one specific CD that you would recommend for me to check out? Writing music- energizing and hypnotic? I’m willing to give it a try- no hablo Espanol, so lyrics wouldn’t be a distraction, although I’d probably prefer instrumental–
Valley Girl | 12.25.05 – 7:06 pm |
Jane, you are always fantastic, but DAMN! you are ON FIRE lately! I didn’t think the bar could get any higher. Many thanks and kudos for just bein you. wow.
Jane:
Should we not set up a similar organization to compensate those on the left? Fight fire with fire. I am sure the money can be raised if it’s *only* $7 million!
I can’t imagine that any of you haven’t yet voted in the MSNBC poll, but here’s the link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904#survey Results as of just a few minutes ago– 30,000 more votes than when Jane last cited the numbers a day or so ago:
Do you believe President Bush’s actions justify impeachment? * 160325 responses
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial. 85%
No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching “high crimes and misdemeanors.” 5%
No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching. 8%
I don’t know. 2%
-
John Casper & Valley Girl:
OT last night Valley Girl was asking about music wrt facilitating technical writing. Latin music was one of several suggestions.
I couldn’t find the thread, but yes, I know all about Latin music. In fact, that’s my #1 reason (among many) for hating George Bush. Not sure what the question is, but lay it on me.
And funny! Just clicked here from Tbogg – my belly is still quivering like a bowlful from his hysterical Christmas Eve basset blogging.
God I love the left.
The thing is, what with the dropping overall readership of the right-wing part of the blogosphere, and the increasing overall readership of the reality-based part of the blogosphere, Pajamas Media makes absolutely no sense as anything BUT a sheltered workshop for otherwise-unemployable wingnuts.
n69n: ya know who i miss?
mediawhoresonline!
Yeah, I miss the Horse too.
At one point David Neiwert was saying the Horse was due to return, but I guess he (or she) changed plans. I wonder if (s)he was in a small plane wreck.
deadlast, I like your idea. Peaceful and non-violent guerilla action against the various assaults on our democracy and our liberties are badly needed.
Allah Akbar.
justwondering | 12.26.05 – 5:09 pm | #
Yeah, it’s a bit like when everybody shows up to get arrested, the whole system falls down.
Florida Quakers!
rwcole:
I thought the Defense Department intel budget for their various agencies was bigger than NSA’s. ?
The “Bought and Paid for” crew lie to themselves and to everybody who’ll listen. They are paid to lie. They are trying to construct a “reality” built of lies. To live in this “reality” is a recipe for insanity. To preserve yourself against this insanity there is only one weapon – TRUTH.
Keep on pointing out the lies, Jane. Goodonya.
Grandma Jo
JWC | 12.26.05 – 5:15 pm | #
Do you have a blog yourself? Somehow, I can picture “GrandmaJo.blogspot” or something like that as a blog dedicated to advocacy for seniors and grandparents (and grandkids too.)
Sort of gives a warm, cozy feeling seeing the name Grandma Jo.
Great post Jane. Actually, I worry about the financial status of my fav bloggers. I want them to keep their independent ways – but am enough of a realist to know they have to be able to at least make a living. Until the recent issue regarding Digby, I didn’t even know how the blog ads work. Now I do try to click my way through ones that look interesting. I sent Digby a little mojo, but don’t know what else I can do to support the good blogs. Other than NOT clicking on the bad guys and giving them traffic… even to see what they are saying.
Hopefully some day there will be a better economic model for this thing called blogging. In the meantime I thank my lucky stars and the heaven above for such wonderful, independent, and thoughtful voices such as you and Redd and all the others.
Grandma Jo
Re: pajamas media
I was just snooping around on their site. They’ve changed their name to Open Source Media. Sort of a rip-off on the term Open Source Information.
Whew! My eyes are still burning!!
Excellent read.
Picking the Corn out of the PJ sh!t is not so much fun. Luckily for us Wolcott doesn’t mind doing it.
I checked out a few of the blogs – tumbleweed city. I suspect they take turns trolling on each others sites – like street musicians who toss in a few bucks to “prime the pump”.
Bob Parry from consortiumnews.com has done an unchallanged job of exposing this. If anyone deserves funding it’s this guy.
deadlast, I like your idea. Peaceful and non-violent guerilla action against the various assaults on our democracy and our liberties are badly needed.
Allah Akbar.
Paid shills as obvious as the “real people” in commercials who hyperventilate about what’s best for them: Tide or New Tide. Three words:
Gigolo Ann Coulter: paid since college on by RM Scaife. Her books are pre=bought. She’s never had to stand by the crap she writes.
Openly Soused Media is just the latest wingnut hot house.
Jane,
Thank you for that information. I for one did not know any of those right winged blogs, nor did I know they were paid for their spin.
I’d also like to say, earlier when I posted I was new at blogging and asked for comments on my new blog, it was a sincere effort to make a difference to the progressive community.
If you or anyone looked at the blog, you would see that there is not one paid advertisement, but I posted my blog information here just to receive feedback.
I was accused of blog whoring.
But, frankly, don’t all of us on the left owe it to help others along the way? Because each blog, each voice, and each person who makes an effort to reach beyond their own comfort zone, can reach others who normally may not be reached.
I personally began the Angry Taxpayer with that in mind, and I genuinely hope my voice will reach people who don’t realize their tax dollars go towards all these things this corrupt administration is doing.
I apologize if asking for feedback is crass or if even posting this explanation is even crasser.
But the way I read your post, I think it’s a great reminder to welcome other blogs while they take their first tentative steps in their endeavors, instead of letting the right winged paid pajama-bloggers take over cyberspace. and I personally will feel proud as a peacock on the day that FDL decides theangrytaxpayer deserves a spot on their blogroll.
ya know who i miss?
mediawhoresonline!
i will remember (& crack up over) their animation of krauthammer in a clown costume til the day i die!!!!
obsessed, I had the same question about the term, pajamas media.
OT last night Valley Girl was asking about music wrt facilitating technical writing. Latin music was one of several suggestions. Since you list Timba on your homepage and you both are on this thread, I thought I would mention it here.
Jokingly referred to as “No Such Agency,” the N.S.A. was created in absolute secrecy in 1952 by President Harry S. Truman. Today, it is the largest intelligence agency. It is also the most important, providing far more insight on foreign countries than the C.I.A. and other spy organizations.
But the agency is still struggling to adjust to the war on terror, in which its job is not to monitor states, but individuals or small cells hidden all over the world. To accomplish this, the N.S.A. has developed ever more sophisticated technology that mines vast amounts of data. But this technology may be of limited use abroad. And at home, it increases pressure on the agency to bypass civil liberties and skirt formal legal channels of criminal investigation. Originally created to spy on foreign adversaries, the N.S.A. was never supposed to be turned inward. Thirty years ago, Senator Frank Church, the Idaho Democrat who was then chairman of the select committee on intelligence, investigated the agency and came away stunned.
“That capability at any time could be turned around on the American people,” he said in 1975, “and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.”
He added that if a dictator ever took over, the N.S.A. “could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back.”
from Huffington
But never mind what I believe about the most of their audience being liberal blogsphere devotees — it was a magnificent rant.
But those blogs are dull. How many return readers could they possibly have? I suspect most of their hits come from cesspool aficionados, indignation addicts — liberal bloggers and their fans looking for posting fodder.
It’s the YSM. The yellow stream media. Trickle down information for the great unwashed.
What is wrong with the Pajamas Media concept (besides the fact that the participants are idiots) is the fact that it is funded by venture capital. When you are backed by Silicon Valley investors, you are blogging for The Man. In fact, you aren’t even blogging; you may as well call yourself Fox News or CBS or ABC or whatever.
The main ingredient of blogging is that it is citizen media; it is We the People finding our voice, getting up on our electronic soapbox, and speaking truth to power. Pajamas Media is a joke, and I give them 2 years at most before they fold up their jammies and tuck themselves into bankruptcy.
how is readership at pajamas?
Stacy,
The $7 million came from some venture capitalists, here’s a link to a related story:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/05…..html?.v=28
“The investor group is led by Aubrey Chernick, angel investor and technology entrepreneur, and also includes Jim Koshland, a leading member of the Silicon Valley venture capital and technology community, and a DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary venture capital investment partnership.”
Why not just ignore that shit? The people who are going to go there are going to go there. The people who listen to Limbaugh are going to listen to Limbaugh. Free country and all that. And they’re not going to come over here for no educashun, anyway. So chill.
The big p.o. here seems to be the money. Easy for me to say but it’s not what needs to get hung up on. What the Limbaughs thrive on is not the dittoheads, it’s the p.o.ed liburhl attenshun and if they think the money is rubbing it in they love it even more.
They’re jokes. Point it out when they fuck up and contradict themselves. Watch them on C&L. Ridicule their tiny dicks and their dry assholes and their fake hair and their drug addictions. Have a laugh. That much is free.
One of my favorite funny blogs, until the advent of the Pajama Meisters, was Manolo the Shoe Blogger (who is *not* Manolo Blahnik). He does fashion and shoes, and he disses Karl Lagerfeld and Jessica Simpson with excruciating wit, but why is he associated with Them? I can’t recall a political post of either flavor in the past year or so.
At any rate, I no longer read him. He’s off my bookmark list. Sorry, Manolo.
I stopped reading David Corn after I heard he had not only sold out to PM, but also was writing a book with that loser, Michael Isikoff. Mr. Corn seems to be more interested in getting himself some press, then speaking truth to power.
Who offered up the 7 million to PM? Private donors? That’s not govt money, is it?
It does my heart proud to know that there are modern day paul reveres out there calling the thugs on their bullshit. Next we will have to ask if this is not enough, do we go to the next level, and does anyone know what that means. If it hasn’t been defined, you can’t get there…
Jane? Any thoughts?
BTW, I posted this at HuffPo and I thought it worth an additional share:
***********————***************
Think about the following idea. It does nothing for security, but it protects civil rights.
The best way to stop these thugs is to use economics. It costs the NSA and BushCo money to do this type of research–machine scan, human follow up. If every email with certain words gets pulled, then we should make sure all emails sent contain “offending” or “suspicious” phrases. (Freedom of speech issues anyone?)
So, include one of the following in all of your personal emails and phone conversations:
1) Allah Akbar!!
2) Timothy McVeigh
3) Blind Mullah Jackson
4) Violent Overthrow
5) Durka Durka Mohammad Jihad (copywrite Team America)
6) George W. Bush is a ______!
7) Operation Iraqi Freedom
8) They greeted us in the streets with flowers, but they were only on the coffins being processioned down the road.
9) Bill Clinton Gays Lesbians ACLU environment bastille polysyllabic
10) Any refecence to the Bill of Rights.
So, if you just use one of these choice phrases, or one of your own that is equally offensive to George W. Bush, PLASTER IT ON ALL EMAILS. Make the government pay to have each one read. Then, if they don’t already outsource that work to India, the government will have to increase spending for public education.
So Merry Christmas,
(and durkadurkamuhamadjihad)
Santa Cause
What is the meaning and origin of the term “pajamas media”?
Excuse my pathetic ignorance, but I only recently crawled out from under my rock when the Plame commotion got loud enough to awaken me. I’ve caught up on the latest acronyms and I know who Gucky-Gannon is, but I’m still way behind!
thanks
“If they’d care to explain how the jizz of right wing robber barons trying to preserve their privilege of feeding at the taxpayer trough is oh so much more righteous and anything more than illiterate wingnut welfare then let’s fucking hear it.”
Ha! They don’t have what it takes to even tackle this…..counterparts on the right? I think not – idiots at the gate is more like it.
Jane ~ you’re great! I love the writing, the rants and the laser sharp analysis. Plus, no bull shitting, no pulling punches – just the fabulous Truth. Thank you.
Peace.
Jizz of the right wing robber barons?
Tell it, sista, tell it!
-
Most informative rundown I’ve seen. Thanks.
Sometimes it seems the corruptedness of this society is 100% in every possible realm.
I cling to the non-ho bloggers like Tom Hanks on his funky little raft.
That’s an interesting concept…. Even
A distributed search mechanism for the reality based lobe of the blogosphere….
Hmm…
We need our own crawlers…
Excellent rant. I’ve linked to you on my blog!
Jane, I knew you didn’t have any thing to do with them- it just said “bloggers who had joined” so I thought maybe they were taking advantage of FDL’s reputation to make themselves appear more credible ;)
-
Valley girl — rest assured I have absolutely no association with Pajamas media. I think I’m just on their blogroll.
http://pajamasmedia.com/pajamarama.html
Jane, I was just poking around to see what kind of blogs there were (oops, almost typed “flogs” – maybe more appropriate- as in selling it).
And top of the linked page says “Pajamarama — the big directory
“Get to know the over 300 bloggers who have joined the Pajamas Media network. They’re all here. Enter your search terms in the box below, or click on a keyword to see more blogs on the same topic. Come back here anytime you want to see another random list of interesting blogs.”
This is the list I got- and Lo! FDL was there. List I got is copied and pasted here– FYI, as I’m *sure* you haven’t joined the “Pajamas Media network”- or they are using “joined” rather loosely–
Accidental Verbosity
Description: What happens when the Accidental Jedi meets Jay Solo of Verbosity fame? Plus a baby named Sadie.Keywords: books / entertainment / humor / kids / movies / music / TV / pets
Prince Pundit
Description: Soldiers’ stories and the rebuilding of Iraq, from the north coast of Ohio.
Keywords: Current Events / Iraq / military / politics / soldiers / Ohio
Transterrestrial Musings
Description: Space, NASA and politics. It’s not all about space stuff.
Keywords: Current Events / politics / news / Space Exploration / NASA
Meryl Yourish
Description: News, Jews and views.
Keywords: Current Events / Judaism / politics
SlattsNews
Description: Snippets of news and views from round the globe with a regular presentation of happenings in western Victoria, Australia.
Keywords: Australia / culture / politics
Unpopulist
Description: Unpopulist, with opinions popular and unpopular.
Keywords: Africa / music / blogs / capitalism / race / economics / law / recipes / technology / politics / Middle East / Condoleeza Rice / Iraq / Islam
Family Matters
Description: Fun ways to keep in touch with friends and family using tools, technologies and tips.
Keywords: family / military / history / technology / software
Daniel Drezner
Description: Daniel W. Drezner, author and assistant professor of political science at the University of Chicago, blogs about what he knows best.
Keywords: politics / news / Middle East / Iraq / Foreign Affairs
Conspiracy Squirrels
Description: Squirrels with conspiracy theories talk politics and current events.
Keywords: humor / musings / politics / news
Advice Goddess
Description: Saucy syndicated advice columnist Amy Alkon explores dating, personal relations, social politics, the gender wars, family and marriage, and whacks Bush and the social conservatives.
Keywords: family / marriage / dating / personal / politics / women / men
Egoist
Description: Reason, egoism, laissez-faire capitalism.
Keywords: politics / economics / World Affairs / news
Firedog Lake
Author: Jane Hamsher
Description:
Keywords:
–
Sooner or later they are going to have to empty those pants…
PeeeeUuuuuu !
“There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.” – Niccoló Machiavelli (The Prince, 1532)
I truly wonder if the likes of Rush, Hannity, and O’Reilly are on the take too. I can’t see how anyone could say what they say with a straight face if you weren’t getting payola for it.
Turd!
Wow. This is a fine piece of righteous rantage. Thank you. I hadn’t really followed down the whole Pajamas-Media story (beyond reading a bit about the name troubles), so I appreciate your re-cap and observations. And Neal Boortz? Words fail me. I’m glad they don’t fail YOU.
Fitz!
the balance of power in the blogosphere tilts strongly to the left
What difference does that make?
Do you think many conservatives read liberal blogs? Seriouly. If they do happen onto one by accident they have been conditioned not to believe them. They are under control and this PJM thing is just about making sure they have a steady stable of propagandists around to fill the need for right wing repubaganda. Tossing in a chump like Corn just gives them a shot at snagginng some liberals into their web.
I just don’t understand why liberals don’t realize their message goes NOWHERE.
Don’t get me wrong the liberal blogland serves an important purpose and our demise would quicken without them. Sure the left has easily the most brilliant bloggers, the right admits that, but that has absolutely zero to do with what is getting to people which I think is the point. Parry has been trying to get the left to understand this and no one, especially people like Soros and other “money” folks get it.
I mean sure they serve a very important need, but do you think Atrios or FDL change many minds? By the time they debunk and inform the left of the details of the latest lie from the right, the right has moved on to the next one. Oh, maybe Olberman will pick it up but again he talks to the converted – sends info out to the abyss. The right doesn’t care about reality, it’s about controlling minds, maintaining a steady diet of propaganda for their cult to feed on. Participants in PJM may not understand that but their benefactors do.
Sure, if the top ten bloggers on the left get behind something it MAY see some action in other media but that has to be a huge story. The left lives in an echo chamber, the problem is the only ones in the chamber are liberals.
Try asking someone outside of Ohio if they have heard of “coingate” or if they ever heard that Republican muckety mucks are being jailed in New Hampshire for pissing on voters rights.
They don’t know.
The left has Soros, Hollywood, labor unions and academia, the right has churches, a few eccentric millionaires like Moon and Scaife, talk radio and PJ Media.
It seems to me that neither side has exclusive rights to the “poor me, I’m such a victim” franchise. There is certainly a lot more money funding lefty bloggers than righty bloggers, by a very large margin.
This post is idiotic. PJ Media is certainly an ill-conceived joke, but the balance of power in the blogosphere tilts strongly to the left and one crazy Likudnik more or less isn’t going to change that.
PJM whore John Cole from Balloon Juice is having a hissy fit over the criticism of those who associate with Pantsload media…
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=6397#comments
apparently, his approach is that for him, taking money from PJM is like a nymphomaniac working as a prostitute — if you’re gonna be a whore, and someone offers you cash, why NOT take it?
On the subject of paid shills.
Pajamas Media == Bad
Media Matters == Good
Explain this to me?