
I’m feeling some self-generated pressure these days to stop just making shit up and check out my facts before I start banging on the keyboard. There actually is an up side to having a blog you figure nobody is ever going to read. It’s a whole lot less work.
Which brings us to poor Mark Kleiman. I’ve already pestered him repeatedly this week with emails on a post I’m working up about meth, and then I read that James Comey has gone and appointed David Margolis to assume the task of supervising Patrick J. Fitzgerald within the Justice Department on the Plame investigation. I google around and I come across this post by Mark where he says he knows Margolis. So I figure, with the fate of the free world riding on the back of this investigation, what’s one more email when democracy hangs in the balance, eh?
So I send him an email, saying “you are gonna be really sorry you ever met me,” but asking him what he thinks of the Margolis appointment. ‘Cos enquiring minds want to know. This is his reply:
Jane:I’m already sorry I ever met you.
My hatred of the Bush Administration and everyone in it is my most prized possession. I’d rather have a root canal than admit that any Bush appointee would ever do anything honest, especially in a politically touchy situation. But you’re forcing me to do just that.
Â
Margolis isn’t just a good choice, he’s the perfect choice. As the head of the Organized Crime program, he spent most of a career supervising complicated conspiratorial cases, some of which used rather extreme investigative methods and many of which involved getting lower-level hoods to flip on their superiors.
Â
He’s tough as nails, and can’t be pushed around by anybody.And now that you’ve told me about it, I have to say so publicly.Â
Â
I hate you.Mark
I think I’m in love. I may have to have that tattooed on my ass.
Anyway, Dr. Kleiman is much too decent a guy to leave hanging in the lurch like that. You know, worried that the Bush Administration might actually have done something ethical. Which brings us to an email from my friend, former prosecutor and fellow Wiggles fan ReddHead, who thinks the appointment of Margolis may have been Comey’s decision alone:
Comey has a reputation as a very straight shooter, and as someone who doesn’t tolerate manipulative politics as a rationale for stupidity or malice, so that gives me quite a bit of hope that he has been able to select his replacement in monitoring Fitzgerald. This sort of selection process is how things often work in the regular legal world, btw, when a supervisor has been “chinese walled” from a particular matter and the attorney in charge of the matter has to be replaced for whatever reason (maternity leave being a common reason as well as illness and family issues or getting a better offer from another firm and leaving, as examples). The attorney in charge of the matter essentially selects the successor once those higher up on the chain have been walled off precisely because that attorney does not share the ethical quandries and conflicts of interest that attorneys further up the chain would have to deal with in selecting a successor.Â(emphasis not mine)
Fitzgerald is the godfather to one of Comey’s children. When Comey empowered Fitzgerald he gave him a great deal of independence, assuring that he did not have to report to a supervisior and that the only power the supervisor had over him was to fire him. Comey left the Justice Department in large part because he got passed over for the AG job in favor of Abu Gonzalez. His appointment of Margolis, in addition to being the right thing to do, may also have been his parting gift to the Bush Administration. As in the “how many fingers am I holding up?” kind.
Based on comments I’ve read and Mark Kleiman’s rage meter, Margolis does indeed seem like a decent guy, unlike either Timothy Flanigan or David McCallum who appeared to be quite loyal to the Bush junta.
And speaking of David McCallum, how about that Michael Isikoff article in Newsweek last week where he claimed that McCallum would now oversee Fitzgerald, huh? Even though anyone who was only paying remedial attention knew that the story was ungodly bullshit.
I can see ‘em now. “We’ll tell Mikey — he’ll buy anything! Hey Mikey, all’s forgiven over that Koran piss business, we’re gonna pay you back for your righteous Lewinsky coverage — you can have the exclusive, man.” One week later, after Isikoff runs around screaming “Oooh! Skull and Bones!” he looks like a chump. Dan Froomkin, who got it right when no one was looking, must still be rolling his eyeballs.
Catch up with you tomorrow after Kobepalooza.
Update: Dr. Kleiman would like it known that he “managed to escape from the situation without having to acknowledge good behavior by the Bushies.” As he is the future author of my ass I feel I must honor his request.



18 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Dick Cheney – Human hunting……it’s coming, Fitzgerald better be a fast runner!
Putting politics ever-so-slightly aside, FITZGERALD’S A BABE!!!!
At last — the perfect boyfriend for Anderson Cooper.
Rove’s guilt isn’t the question in this context, it’s whether they return an indictment or not… and my guess is that an indictment is still problematic.
“There actually is an up side to having a blog you figure nobody is ever going to read.” Ain’t it the—- truth? Never seen you slack yet—still one of the best around! M
Well, I’ll be darned! If this post didn’t just downright cheer me up. I’ve been down in the dumps lately. Especially regarding the ‘Rove’ factor. You have given my a much need lift.
Thanks a bizillion!
Joel – Us older folks need Large Print.
i am fortunate enough to have seen jane’s ass (clothed), and it’s lovely. i wouldn’t besmirch it with a tattoo, if she was asking my opinion.
that aside, i wonder why david mccallum just doesn’t go back and work for u.n.c.l.e..
Oh I’m under no illusions Rove will ever go to jail. Even if he is indicted and convicted we both know he’ll be pardoned if at all possible.
And it may be that BushCo. closes ranks successfully and nothing comes out of the investigation that the grand jury will indict. Which would be sad. Always a possibililty. But, I hope, remote.
Kind of you to say, fdl.
Although I’m not holding my breath for jail time, I secretly dream of one, just one, frogmarch photo to broadcast around the world. I’m very curious about what kind of indictments will come out of this, though.
Huffman — Rove is guilty. No one is disputing he gave up Valerie Plame’s identity up to journalists. Whether Fitizgerald will be allowed to finish his investigation or not is another matter.
Thanks, iamcoyote, I always read your stuff too. You’ve always done great work over at the Left Coaster and I like your new blog, Low and Left a lot, too.
Hey, I read you every day, so no slacking! Great post, btw, you give me hope to carry on.
Damn keyboard. That was me. BTW fdl, I’m looking for a new tattoo of my own.
Gordon beat me to it. BTW, will fdl post a pic of her tattooed derriere? I’m emailing the boys at Miami Ink. for font suggestions.
http://tlc.discovery.com/fansi…..intro.html
Gordon: She can use small letters if the artiste is adept.
I’d like to see a picture of the final product, Jane.
Now, what were you saying? Something about the DOJ?
I know this raises your hopes that an indictment for Rove (and whoever else the net can snag). However does this also mean you’ll be more likely to feel it’s legitimate if there isn’t a Rove indictment?
Or will Fitzgerald and Margolis suddenly be dismissed as hacks?
I know it’s dang near inconceivable to you that Rove won’t be indicted… but just imagine for a moment otherwise.
Good post.
You got that big an ass? Wow. :)
Fitzapalooza !